MedPath

Clinical Comparison of a Postbiotic-gel With Placebo Gel for Gingival Inflammation in Patients With Down Syndrome

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Down Syndrome
Gingival Bleeding
Interventions
Other: Biorepair Plus Parodontgel Intensive
Other: Placebo gel
Registration Number
NCT06293911
Lead Sponsor
University of Pavia
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of home treatment with a postbiotic-based gel for the management of periodontal inflammation in patients with Down syndrome.

Patients will be enrolled at the S.C. Odontostomatologia dell'Azienda Ospedaliera "Ordine Mauriziano di Torino", Turin, Italy. After the collection of the periodontal clinical indexes (BoP%, PCR%, dental mobility, mMGI, compliance and satisfaction questionnaire), patients will undergo a professional mechanical debridement with ultrasonic instruments and glycine powders.

Then, they will be randomly divided into two groups according to the home treatment:

* in the Trial group Biorepair Plus Parodontgel Intensive (containing microRepair®, hyaluronic acid, Lactobacillus Ferment and Aloe Barbadensis Leaf Juice Powder) will be used once a day for all the duration of the study

* in the Control group, a placebo gel without (active ingredients) will be used once a day for all the duration of the study.

Indexes will be re-evaluated after 1 (T1), 3 (T2) and 6 months. The professional mechanical debridement will be performed again at T3 timepoint.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • not bedridden patients with Down syndrome
  • gingival inflammation and bleeding
Exclusion Criteria
  • lack of compliance signalled by caregivers
  • other systemic diseases

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Postbiotic groupBiorepair Plus Parodontgel Intensive-
Placebo groupPlacebo gel-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Bleeding on Probing (BOP%)Baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and after 6 months (T3)

Dichotomous scoring (yes/no) of bleeding sites on 4 surfaces of teeth.

Change in Modified Gingival IndexBaseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and after 6 months (T3)

Scoring criteria (one measurement for each tooth: upper first incisors, first premolars/first primary molars and first molars):

0. Absence of inflammation

Mild inflammation (marginal or papillary unit) Mild inflammation (entire marginal and papillary unit) Moderate inflammation Severe inflammation

Change in Plaque Control Record (PCR%)Baseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and after 6 months (T3)

% assessment of the amount of plaque on dental surfaces; it is detected on 4 surfaces: distal, mesial, vestibular, lingual / palatal. The number of sites with plaque is divided by the total number of sites available in the mouth and multiplied by 100. Results indicate the index as a percentage.

Change in product satisfactionBaseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and after 6 months (T3)

* Product liking questionnaire: evaluation of taste, smell, consistency, persistence and ease of application by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and filling out a questionnaire to which a score from 0 to 10 is associated, of which:

* 0: Insufficient;

* 1 to 3: Sufficient;

* 4 to 6: Good;

* 7 to 9: Very Good;

* 10: Excellent.

Change in Dental mobilityBaseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and after 6 months (T3)

Scoring criteria

Grade 0: oscillation within 0.2 mm; the teeth move naturally and there are no mobility problems; Grade I: horizontal mobility of the tooth from 0.2 to 1 mm; Grade II: horizontal mobility of the tooth from 1 to 2 mm; Grado III: horizontal mobility equal to or greater than 3 mm or vertical mobility of the tooth.

Change in complianceBaseline (T0), after 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2) and after 6 months (T3)

Subjective evaluation of the patient's degree of compliance with the proposed treatment by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), assessing compliance with dosage, alterations and modifications on lifestyle, and adherence to set recalls; to which is associated a score from 0 to 10 of which:

* 0 to 2: Poor compliance;

* 3 to 5: Sufficient compliance;

* 6 to 8: Good compliance;

* 9 to 10: Excellent compliance.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

S.C. Odontostomatologia - Azienda Ospedaliera "Ordine Mauriziano di Torino"

🇮🇹

Turin, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath