Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07250451
NCT07250451CompletedNot Applicable

The Effect Of Multiple Scenarios Simulation Education And Clinical Practice On Nursing Students' Competence: Quasi Experimental Crossover Study

Duzce University1 site in 1 country94 target enrollmentStarted: January 15, 2024Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
94
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Nursing Competence

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to determine the effect of integrated education, combining clinical practice and simulation laboratory training, on the competence of second-year undergraduate nursing students. This research is designed as a multi-crossover quasi-experimental randomized controlled study. In this model, all groups were exposed to simulation training sessions in specific stages. This design is currently used in the clinical practice component of the Surgical Nursing course. Additionally, the researchers aimed to answer the question: "What is the most appropriate timing for simulation training to enhance nursing students' competence?"

During the clinical practice of the Surgical Diseases Nursing course, approximately 29-33 students participated in the simulation laboratory sessions, while about 61-65 students were involved in clinical field practice. For the simulation sessions, subgroups consisting of 4-5 students were formed. After each subgroup completed the simulation practice, a debriefing session was conducted. Each simulation scenario and related training lasted approximately half a day.

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate the effect of integrating simulation-based laboratory sessions with clinical practice on the competence of second-year undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the Surgical Nursing course. The study was designed as a quasi-experimental, randomized, multi-crossover study model. In this design, all student groups were sequentially exposed to simulation-based training integrated within the clinical education process, allowing each group to experience both simulation and clinical practice in different sequences.

Setting

The laboratory environment was located on the first floor of the Faculty of Health Sciences. It was arranged as a patient room and equipped with two full-body low-fidelity mannequins and all necessary nursing materials for patient care. The lab had a capacity of 15-17 students and included a separate area with chairs and a whiteboard for debriefing and discussion sessions. Before each simulation, the environment and mannequins were prepared in accordance with the specific scenario. Simulation implementation and debriefing were conducted by the first author, while clinical practice supervision was carried out by the other three researchers.

Simulation Scenarios

A total of seven different low-fidelity simulation scenarios were used, including:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

This study was conducted as an open-label educational intervention. Neither participants nor researchers were blinded to group assignment due to the nature of the simulation and clinical training interventions. Data were entered into a statistical program and analyzed by an expert statistician who was blinded to group allocation.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Undergraduate nursing students enrolled in the second year of the program
  • •Willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Students under 18 years of age
  • •Students who do not provide voluntary consent

Arms & Interventions

Simulation-First Hybrid Training

Experimental

Students in Simulation-First Hybrid Training participated in four days of simulation-based training followed by eight days of clinical practice. Simulation sessions were conducted in subgroups of 4-5 students, followed by debriefing sessions. Clinical practice was conducted in hospital settings under faculty supervision.

Intervention: Educational/training (Other)

Clinical Practice-Simulation-Clinical Practice (Integrated Training)

Experimental

Students in Clinical Practice-Simulation-Clinical Practice (Integrated Training) first completed four days of clinical practice, then four days of simulation-based training, followed by an additional four days of clinical practice. Simulation and clinical practice sessions were conducted as described for Simulation-First Hybrid Training.

Intervention: Educational/training (Other)

Clinical Practice-First Training Followed by Simulation

Experimental

Students in Clinical Practice-First Training Followed by Simulation completed eight days of clinical practice, followed by four days of simulation-based training. Simulation and clinical practice sessions were conducted as described for Simulation-First Hybrid Training.

Intervention: Educational/training (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Nursing Competence

Time Frame: up to 12 weeks

The primary outcome is the level of nursing competence of second-year undergraduate nursing students, measured using a validated Nursing Competence Scale. Competence assessment includes clinical skills, decision-making, and ability to apply theoretical knowledge in simulation and clinical practice settings.

Simulation Learning

Time Frame: up to 12 weeks

Learning outcomes specific to simulation sessions were assessed using the Simulation Learning Evaluation Scale. This scale measures students' understanding, performance, and ability to apply skills in the simulated environment. Administered to each laboratory subgroup after simulation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Demographic Data(Baseline (pre-intervention))

Investigators

Sponsor
Duzce University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Atiye Erbaş

Assistant Professor

Duzce University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials