Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02396537
NCT02396537CompletedNot Applicable

Efficacy of Topical Lidocaine to Decrease Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

University of Alabama at Birmingham0 sites77 target enrollmentStarted: January 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
77
Primary Endpoint
Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to establish whether premedication with topical lidocaine would reduce the pain associated with IN midazolam administration in children. The study was designed to be a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial performed in an urban, academic pediatric emergency department.

Detailed Description

This was a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial performed in an urban, academic pediatric emergency department with an annual census of 67,000 patients. Children 6-12 years old for whom IN midazolam was ordered were eligible for enrollment. Patients were randomly assigned an identical intranasal medication (4% Lidocaine or 0.9% saline). Patients were administered the study drug followed by IN midazolam. Patients then assigned a pain score for midazolam administration using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating scale. The primary endpoint of pain score was analyzed with a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
6 Years to 12 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Ages 6-12
  • Previously healthy
  • Attending physician concludes that the patient would benefit from administration of an anxiolysis medication prior to a minor procedure

Exclusion Criteria

  • Moderate to severe asthma or other chronic lung disease
  • Co-morbid conditions including cerebral palsy, developmental delay, or other chronic illness deemed by the Attending physician to be unsafe to receive anxiolysis with Versed.
  • Any child presenting with a life-threatening condition.

Arms & Interventions

Intranasal Lidocaine

Experimental

Patient to receive 4% lidocaine intranasally prior to midazolam

Intervention: Lidocaine (Drug)

Intranasal Lidocaine

Experimental

Patient to receive 4% lidocaine intranasally prior to midazolam

Intervention: Midazolam (Drug)

Intranasal 0.9% saline

Placebo Comparator

Patient to receive 0.9% Saline intranasally prior to midazolam

Intervention: Midazolam (Drug)

Intranasal 0.9% saline

Placebo Comparator

Patient to receive 0.9% Saline intranasally prior to midazolam

Intervention: 0.9% Saline (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Discomfort With Intranasal Midazolam Administration

Time Frame: immediately after administration of intranasal midazolam

subject self-reports pain with intranasal midazolam utilizing the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale. This scale is a well-established ordinal pain scale for pediatric patients. It is one score (no subscales), with a minimum score of 0 (signifying "No Hurt") and a maximum score of 10 ("Hurts Worst"). Values between include 2 ("Hurts Little Bit"), 4 ("Hurts Little More"), 6 ("Hurts Even More"), and 8 ("Hurts Whole Lot."). Children indicate one value/answer. Thus, a higher score indicates a worse outcome (more pain).

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Christopher Pruitt

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Faculty Advisor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Similar Trials