Neurofeedback Training of Metacognition in Subjects With Alcohol Use Disorder. Disorder Induces Neural Modifications: an Event-related Potentials Study
- Conditions
- Alcohol Use Disorder
- Interventions
- Device: Neurofeedback placeboDevice: Neurofeedback active
- Registration Number
- NCT05913518
- Lead Sponsor
- Brugmann University Hospital
- Brief Summary
Addressing cognitive deficits in alcohol use disorder (AUD) supports recovery. Impaired metacognitive functioning in AUD causes compromised recognition of the interoceptive state leading to the maintenance of alcohol abuse despite negative consequences. By promoting greater self-awareness and self-regulation, neurofeedback training is of high relevance in metacognition remediation to support abstinence.
The main objective of the present study is to validate neurofeedback as a complementary clinical tool to overcome metacognitive deficits that represent a significant factor in the maintenance of harmful consumption behavior and relapse phenomena in AUD.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 130
- Patients aged between 18 and 65 years old undergoing a 3- to 4-week detoxification treatment program at the Alcohol Unit of CHU Brugmann hospital (Brussels, BELGIUM), who have been diagnosed with severe AUD (alcohol use disorder) according to the DSM-V-TR.
- history of neurological disorders
- other serious medical conditions
- neuroleptic treatment are excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Placebo feedback group Neurofeedback placebo - Active neurofeedback group Neurofeedback active -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Event related potential Immediately after the last neurofeedback training session T1 Error related negativity (ERN) measurement
Metacognition questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30) Immediately after the last neurofeedback training session T1 Metacognitive assessment by means of a questionnaire. Scores from 6 to 24, with higher scores meaning worse outcomes.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Commission error rate Immediately after the last neurofeedback training session T1 Behavior assessment
Reaction times Baseline T0 Behavior assessment
Abstinence 3 months post discharge Number of days of abstinence
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHU Brugmann
🇧🇪Brussels, Belgium
CHU Brugmann🇧🇪Brussels, BelgiumSalvatore CampanellaPrincipal InvestigatorClémence DoussetSub Investigator