跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04655963
NCT04655963
进行中(未招募)
不适用

Neuromodulation and Plasticity in Cognitive Control Neurocircuitry in Chronic Stroke

Medical University of South Carolina1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人2021年1月14日

概览

阶段
不适用
干预措施
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
疾病 / 适应症
Chronic Stroke
发起方
Medical University of South Carolina
入组人数
20
试验地点
1
主要终点
Demonstrate acceptability of an accelerated protocol of rTMS in stroke patients using an acceptability of rTMS questionnaire.
状态
进行中(未招募)
最后更新
上个月

概览

简要总结

Few treatments are available for post-stroke rehabilitation. The current study aims to develop a novel, short-term, high-dose repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) based intervention to improve post-stroke cognitive problems. This study will test the safety as well as changes in cognitive function and brain activation with the administration of an accelerated rTMS protocol in chronic stroke.

详细描述

The goal of this pilot study is to determine whether a repetitive high-dose form of non-invasive brain stimulation is a promising and safe treatment for stroke-related cognitive difficulties. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an FDA approved treatment for depression, and is used commonly to treat people for their depression. In studies of rTMS for depression and other disorders, individuals have experienced improved cognitive function. Thus, we are testing here whether cognitive function in individuals with chronic stroke could be improved by rTMS.

注册库
clinicaltrials.gov
开始日期
2021年1月14日
结束日期
2026年5月15日
最后更新
上个月
研究类型
Interventional
研究设计
Single Group
性别
All

研究者

责任方
Sponsor

入排标准

入选标准

  • Have right hemisphere ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within last 6 months chronicity
  • Able to perform given cognitive tasks
  • No metal implanted in the body
  • A negative urine pregnancy test, if female subject of childbearing potential.

排除标准

  • Primary intracerebral hematoma or subarachnoid hemorrhage
  • Bi-hemispheric ischemic strokes
  • Other concomitant neurological disorders affecting motor or cognitive function
  • History of seizure disorder
  • Preexisting scalp lesion or wound or bone defect or hemicraniectomy
  • Substance use disorder
  • Psychotic disorders
  • Claustrophobia

研究组 & 干预措施

Dose 1

All participants would receive open-label treatment for approximately eight, 3-minute sessions of intermittent theta burst rTMS on each of three days within a seven-day span. A single session=600 pulses at 120% rMT, iTBS triplets at 50 Hz for 2 s and repeated every 10 s for a total of 190 s to left dlPFC. Total pulses=14,400.

干预措施: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)

结局指标

主要结局

Demonstrate acceptability of an accelerated protocol of rTMS in stroke patients using an acceptability of rTMS questionnaire.

时间窗: Approximately 6 months.

This study will be demonstrating the acceptability of using rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke patients by using an rTMS acceptability scale. The acceptability scale maximum is 100 and the minimum is 0, a higher score means better outcome.

Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Side Effects as assessed by iTBS Review of Systems

时间窗: Approximately 6 months.

This study will be demonstrating the safety of using rTMS in stroke patients by assessing adverse events and side effects using the intermittent transcranial brain stimulation (iTBS) Review of Systems questionnaire. The minimum value of the iTBS scale is 0 and the maximum is 75, the higher the score the more severe the side effects meaning a worse outcome.

Assess feasibility, of an accelerated protocol of rTMS in stroke patients looking at retention and using an rTMS a credibility questionnaire pre/post treatment.

时间窗: Approximately 6 months.

This study will be demonstrating the feasibility of using rapid transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in stroke patients by assessing retention throughout the study and using a credibility scale. The credibility scale maximum is 36 and minimum is 0, a higher ratings means higher credibility score which is a better outcome.

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验