A clinical study comparison between two groups of intestinal tract cleansing agents for colon capsule endoscopy based on the colonoscopy as a golden standard, and usefulness of interpretation support by clinical engineering technologist.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- suspect of colorectal cancer
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000029398
- Lead Sponsor
- Public Interest Incorporated Association, Kagoshima, Nanpuh Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 20
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
1. Person who has dysphagia disorder. 2. Person who have a history of allergic to drugs used in this study. 3. A woman who is pregnant or suspected to be pregnant. 4. Person who will undergo MRI within 2 weeks after colon capsule endoscopy. 5. Person who have a history of abdominal surgery, and there is a possibility of adhesion. 6. Person with present or past history of small and large bowel obstruction. 7. Person who suspicious of having colorectal advanced carcinoma by tumor markers or symptoms. 8. Person inappropriate for this study by other reasons judged by investigators.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1. Comparison between two groups of intestinal tract washing method. Acceptability of whole examination including questionnaire degree of intestinal tract, intestinal tract washing method (questionnaire) 2. Utility of colon capsule endoscope with colonoscopy as a golden standard Colon capsule endoscope total colon observation rate, colon lesion detection rate 3. Usefulness of interpretation support by clinical engineering technologist. Lesion detection rate, interpretation time by doctor 4. Other Clinical information (gender, age, height, body weight, reason for colon examination, etc.)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method