MedPath

Efficacy and Safety of a New Oral Rehydration Solution (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) in Children With Acute Gastroenteritis

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Diarrhea
Interventions
Dietary Supplement: oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200
Dietary Supplement: ESPGHAN ORS
Registration Number
NCT01467570
Lead Sponsor
Medical University of Warsaw
Brief Summary

It is generally recommended that oral rehydration should be used as first-line therapy to treat or prevent dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Refusal to drink regular Oral Rehydration Solution (ORS) interfere with compliance with the recommended treatment.

The objective of this study is to compare the tolerance, acceptance, efficacy and safety of a new ORS (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) of improved palatability with regular ORS recommended by ESPGHAN in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE).

Detailed Description

It is generally recommended that oral rehydration should be used as first-line therapy to treat or prevent dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE). Despite the proven efficacy of oral rehydration therapy it remains underused. The main reason for this is that an ORS neither reduces the frequency of bowel movements and fluid loss nor shortens the duration of illness, which decreases its acceptance. Moreover, unpalatability of regular ORS decrease its acceptance, especially in children with lower degrees of dehydration. Refusal to drink regular ORS interfere with compliance with the recommended treatment. Parents, but also health care professionals, demand safe, effective, inexpensive, but also well tolerated and accepted ORS for management of AGE.

Recently, a new ORS (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) with improved taste has been developed, and is now frequently employed for the management of AGE. The proposed study will be the first double-blind randomized trial of this ORS. It will evaluate clinically meaningful benefits to be derived by children and caregivers from its use. If positive, this new ORS may become a routine recommendation for children with AGE.

The objective of this study is to compare the tolerance, acceptance, efficacy and safety of a new ORS (Hipp ORS 200 Apple) with regular ORS recommended by ESPGHAN in children with AGE.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
147
Inclusion Criteria
  • children age 4 to 48 months
  • diarrhoea defined as the passage of three or more loose or watery stools per day for >1 but <5 days
  • mild (3%) or moderate dehydration (3-9%) according to the World Health Organization criteria (Table 1)
  • informed consent signed by at least one parent / caregiver
Exclusion Criteria
  • diarrhea for <1 or >5 days
  • severe dehydration (>9%)
  • recent history of diarrhea indicated either by parent/guardian or hospital case notes
  • underlying chronic gastrointestinal disease (i.e., celiac disease, cow's milk protein intolerance)
  • breastfeeding >50%
  • under nutrition (weight/height ratio below the fifth percentile)
  • systemic infections
  • immune defects or immunosuppressive treatment

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Hipp ORS Apple 200oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS Apple 200oral rehydration solution Hipp ORS 200 Apple
ESPGHAN ORSESPGHAN ORSESPGHAN oral rehydration solution
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants That Were Successfully RehydratedProportion of successfully rehydrated at 24 hours

The following components are included in primary outcome:

* resolution of signs of dehydration

* adequate weight gain

* production of urine output during the trial

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Unscheduled Intravenous Therapy24 hours

Need for intravenous therapy within 24 hours

Vomiting24 hours

Vomiting starting or progressing in the first 24 hours of therapy

ORS Intake in ml24 hours

ORS intake in ml (in the first 24 hours, and total)

Weight Gain in Gram24 hours

Weight gain in gram (in the first 24 hours, and total)

Duration of Diarrhea (Hrs)7days

Time of diarrhea in hours

Return Visit to the Emergency Department1 week

Return visit to the emergency department within a week

Hospitalization1 week

need for hospitalization within a week

Adverse Events24 hours

any adverse event, providing a description if related or not related to study intervention

ORS Intake at 4 h4 hrs

% of prescribed ORS that was consumed during first 4 hours

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Peadiatrics, The Medical University of Warsaw

šŸ‡µšŸ‡±

Warsaw, Poland

Ā© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath