Effects of a 12-week Laughing Qigong Program on Psychological Outcomes and the Physiological Immunological Responses Among Female Breast Cancer Survivors: A Quasi-experimental Nonequivalent Control Group
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 71
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI)
研究概览
简要总结
Laughter programs are safe, affordable, and age-appropriate activities. Few studies have utilized mixed study designs to look at the impact on resilience in and experiences of participants in such activities.
详细描述
The laughing qigong program is a physical and mental practice program that combines qigong and laughter. It is influenced by Chinese local culture. It emphasizes the transformation of voice, body, and emotional use so that people can experience relaxation and tranquility, and then the transformation of emotions so that physical and mental energy can be released then to achieve balance. Our research has shown that laughter-related psychological interventions have consistent effects on mental health, reducing mood conditions under life stress (Grace, 2013), depressed mood (Hsieh et al., 2015), and cortisol concentration (Grace, 2013). However, there have only been a few studies where similar protocols focused on positive mental states (e.g. resilience, well-being) and the application of laughing in immune function.
Therefore, the current quasi-experimental trial was to investigate the effects of the LQP on psychological outcomes (resilience and well-being), mucosal immunity (salivary immunoglobulin A, s-IgA), and immune-inflammatory index (interleukins, IL-6) amongst breast cancer survivors. We hypothesized that (a) experimental group participants would have significantly higher levels of resilience and well-being at baseline (before the test) and post-treatment (post-test) compared to the wait list control group; (b) Compared to the control group on the wait list, experimental group participants will have significant differences in mucosal immunity (s-IgA) and inflammatory index (IL-6) before and after the test; and (c) experimental group membership had a significant effect on psychological outcomes (resilience and well-being) as well as mucosal immunity (s-IgA) and immune-inflammatory indices (IL-6) after a 12-week LQP intervention
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor) Blinded to group membership, research assistants collected data from both groups.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •female adult (18 years old); 2) diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer; 3) major treatment completed at least 3 months ago (i.e. surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy); and 4) no communication difficulties (visual and auditory).
排除标准
- •having recurrent or metastatic breast cancer; 2) being involved in other studies at the same time, 3) patients who are unable to cooperate with the trial and follow-up; and 4) having a history of mental illness in past 3 months (major depression disorder)..
结局指标
主要结局
Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI)
时间窗: 12-week after intervention (T2)]
The Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI) Scale was used to assess one's mental health, the indicator has 15 items divided into four categories: mental state, mental capacity, mental equality, and social support (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007; Songprakun and McCann 2012). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (never) to 3, with a total score of 45 points indicating better well-being outcomes. The scale has good reliability and construct validity (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007), and it was used by two-way translation and showed excellent reliability (0.90) in this study. This scale is used after the second stage translation was completed and confirming when the sentences be smooth and the meaning.
Pre-intervention(T0)]
时间窗: Pre-intervention(T0)]
The Thai Mental Health Indicator (TMHI) Scale was used to assess one's mental health, the indicator has 15 items divided into four categories: mental state, mental capacity, mental equality, and social support (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007; Songprakun and McCann 2012). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 (never) to 3, with a total score of 45 points indicating better well-being outcomes. The scale has good reliability and construct validity (Mongkol, Tangseree, Udomratn, Huttapanom, \& Chuta, 2007), and it was used by two-way translation and showed excellent reliability (0.90) in this study. This scale is used after the second stage translation was completed and confirming when the sentences be smooth and the meaning
Resilience Scale
时间窗: 12-week after intervention (T2)]
This scale is used to assess an individual's resilience to setbacks. There is a total of 25 items. For each item, the Likert five-point scale is used, with scores ranging from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied) (very satisfied). The higher the score, the more resilient to frustration. The scale was divided into five items, the higher the score, which are a meaningful life, a peaceful mind, self-confidence, an indomitable spirit, and acceptance of the loneliness of existence (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993).The psychometric evaluation of this scale supports its internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity as a good tool for measuring resilience (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993), and the scale has also been translated into Chinese and demonstrates good reliability (α=0.91) and validity
Resilience scale
时间窗: Pre-intervention(T0)]
This scale is used to assess an individual's resilience to setbacks. There is a total of 25 items. For each item, the Likert five-point scale is used, with scores ranging from 1 (extremely dissatisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied) (very satisfied). The higher the score, the more resilient to frustration. The scale was divided into five items, the higher the score, which are a meaningful life, a peaceful mind, self-confidence, an indomitable spirit, and acceptance of the loneliness of existence (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993).The psychometric evaluation of this scale supports its internal consistency reliability and concurrent validity as a good tool for measuring resilience (Wagnild, \& Young, 1993), and the scale has also been translated into Chinese and demonstrates good reliability (α=0.91) and validity.
次要结局
- Ｍucosal immunity (secretory(s)-IgA) immunoglobulin A(12-week after intervention (T2)])
- Saliva Interleukin-6 (IL-6(12-week after intervention (T2)])
研究者
Chia Jung Hsieh
Ph.D., RN, Associate Professor
National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences