Impact Of Digital Photography & Conventional Method On The Accuracy Of Dental Shade Matching In The Esthetic Zone

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Accuracy of Dental Shade Selection in the Aesthetic Zone
• Interventions: Device: Vita 3D master shade guide; Device: Digital photography using software Photoshop

• Registration Number: NCT03229707
• Lead Sponsor: Cairo University

Brief Summary

The aim of this study:

Is to evaluate the accuracy of digital photography in optimizing shade matching when compared to conventional method of shade selection.

Detailed Description

Randomized control trial, 2 groups will be included. Group 1: Color matching using Vita 3D master, using modified (USPHS) criteria Group 2: Color matching using digital photography using (Photoshop adopt) the assessment will be through a questionnaire for the patient satisfaction outcome using Visual analogue scale

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2017-07-23
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-07-23
• Study First Posted: 2017-07-25
• Study Start: 2018-07-01
• Primary Completion: 2018-10-31
• Study Completion: 2019-08-01
• Status Verified: 2021-07
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-07-26
• Last Update Posted: 2021-07-29

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 9

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients between 18-70 years old, able to read and sign the informed consent document.
2. Patients requiring restorations in the esthetic zone.
3. Patients don't have active periodontal or pulpal diseases
4. Patients willing to return for follow-up examination and evaluation.

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients in the growth stage.
2. Patients with poor oral hygiene and lack of motivation.
3. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
group 1 Color matching using Vita 3D master	Vita 3D master shade guide	Outcome Name: Color Matching measured by : Modified (USPHS) criteria
group 2 Color matching using digital photography	Digital photography using software Photoshop	Outcome Name: Color Matching measured by Digital Photography using (Photoshop) Software: * 0 to 1: no difference in perception * 1 to 2: only perceptible to a trained observer * 2 to 3.5: perceptible difference * 3.5 to 5: marked difference

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Patient satisfaction	1 year	Visual analogue scale

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Color Matching	1 year	Digital Photography using (Photoshop)/using Vita 3D master Modified (USPHS) criteria

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Cairo University; 🇪🇬 Cairo, Egypt