Non - Incised Papilla Versus Single Flap Technique In The Reconstruction Of Intrabony Defect: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Periodontal Attachment Loss
- Sponsor
- Ain Shams University
- Enrollment
- 20
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- interproximal clinical attachment level change
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The present study will aim to assess the effectiveness of the non-Incised Papilla surgical approach NIPSA used for the surgical debridement of deep intraosseous defects compared to the single-flap approach SFA.
Primary outcome: interproximal clinical attachment level gain Secondary outcomes: residual probing pocket depth (PPD), pocket depth (PD) reduction, recession (REC), location of the tip of the papilla (TP), width of the keratinized tissue (KT), wound closure (WC), supra-alveolar attachment gain (SUPRA-AG)
Detailed Description
The present study will aim to assess the effectiveness of the non-Incised Papilla surgical approach NIPSA used for the surgical debridement of deep intraosseous defects compared to the single-flap approach SFA. Primary outcome: interproximal clinical attachment level gain Secondary outcomes: residual probing pocket depth (PPD), pocket depth (PD) reduction, recession (REC), location of the tip of the papilla (TP), width of the keratinized tissue (KT), wound closure (WC), supra-alveolar attachment gain (SUPRA-AG)
Investigators
Alaa Talaat Ali
lecturer
Ain Shams University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •- Age \> 18 years
- •Diagnosis with stage III-IV periodontitis.
- •Presence of one or more intrabony defects with probing pocket depth (PPD) \> 5 mm and radiographic defect depth \> 4 mm.
- •Full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) and full-mouth bleeding score (FMBS) \< 30% (measured at four sites per tooth).
- •No relevant systemic condition or disease.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Third molars and teeth with type III mobility or with an incorrect endodontic or restorative treatment.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
interproximal clinical attachment level change
Time Frame: at baseline ,6 and 12 months
CAL, measured in the interproximal space from the CEJ to the base of the pocket(BP)using a millimeter periodontal probe
Secondary Outcomes
- residual probing pocket depth (PPD), pocket depth (PD) change,(at at baseline ,6 and 12 months)