Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2025/04/085160
CTRI/2025/04/085160Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

An observational study to identify the intervertebral space for the ease of spinal anaesthesia in four different sitting positions

Department of Anaesthesiology Gandhi medical college1 site in 1 country80 target enrollmentStarted: April 29, 2025Last updated:

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Enrollment
80
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
To identify interspinous space, reduce number of spinal needle bone contacts and number of attempts.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Spinal anesthesia is a neuraxial anesthesia technique in which local anesthetic is placed directly in the intrathecal space (subarachnoid space). The subarachnoid space houses sterile cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the clear fluid that bathes the brain and spinal cord. There are roughly about 130 to 140 mL of CSF in an adult human which continually cycles throughout the day. Approximately 500 mL of CSF gets produced daily. Spinal anaesthesia is the most commonly used  anaesthetic technique for patients undergoing surgical procedure like infra-umbilical, perineum, pelvicgirdle. Spinal anaesthesia is useful in patients where severe respiratory disease or a difficult airway increases the risk of general anaesthesia.

Patient positioning during administration of spinal anesthesia is very important. Poor positioning may cause repeated spinal needle insertions and increase the risk of back pain, post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), epidural hematoma, and neural trauma. The sitting position is frequently used for patients undergoing spinal anesthesia, especially when low lumbar and sacral levels of sensory anesthesia are needed for the surgical procedure. The most important point for performing a neuroaxial block in a sitting position is reducing lumbar lordosis, resulting in easier access to the intervertebral space; on the other hand, lumbar flexion pushes the theca sac into a more superficial position

It is sometimes difficult for some patients to optimally flex their hips and knees making traditional position for induction of spinal anaesthesia difficult to achieve.Hence, there are a few  different modified sitting positions for this purpose like forward bending position(hamstring stretch position),squatting position and crossed-leg sitting position.

The traditional sitting position (TSP) is the most common position for spinal or epidural anesthesia where the patient sits on the operating table, with both feet placed on a stool, and both hips and knees maximally flexed . Four decades ago, a new sitting position was introduced to reduce lumbar lordosis for “easier” spinal puncture; this position involved maximum extension of the knees, adduction of the hips, and forward bending. Based on this idea, modified sitting positions have been introduced for spinal or epidural anesthesia. In these positions, the patients are sat up on the operating table, but the legs remain on the table, which is different from the TSP. In the hamstring stretch position (HSP), the knees are maximally extended , whereas in the squatting position (SP), both the hips and knees are maximally flexed .Similar success rates have been reported in studies comparing TSP with modified sitting positions for epidural or spinal anesthesia.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age group 18-60years of either sex, ASA grade II scheduled for lower abdominal surgeries, perineal and pelvic girdle surgeries.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient refusal.
  • Localised sepsis.
  • Raised icp.
  • Any anatomical site abnormality.
  • Any neurological deficit spinal stenosis myelopathy cardiac patients BMI:28 allergy to local anaesthetics Coagulopathies lumbar surgical scar.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

To identify interspinous space, reduce number of spinal needle bone contacts and number of attempts.

Time Frame: Perioperatively

Secondary Outcomes

  • To determine success rates, systolic , diastolic and mean arterial pressure changes after spinal anaesthesia induction and any adverse effects. To assess motor block onset time and sensory block time along with the ease of spinal positioning(Till 50 mins after induction)

Investigators

Sponsor
Department of Anaesthesiology Gandhi medical college
Sponsor Class
Government medical college
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Y Sandhya Rani

Hamidia Hospital, Gandhi Medical College

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials