MedPath

Decision Aid for Dementia Therapies

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Dementia
Decision Aids
Registration Number
NCT06638632
Lead Sponsor
University of Colorado, Denver
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to develop a decision aid to support patients and families making decisions about medications for dementia.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria

Patients:

  • UCHealth patient
  • Ages 18 y/o and above
  • Documented neurocognitive deficits suggestive of mild cognitive impairment or early dementia as determined by their treating clinician.
  • English or Spanish speaking

Caregiver:

  • Ages 18 y/o and above
  • Identified by the study participant as the person who helps the most with their medical care outside the hospital or clinic.
  • English or Spanish speaking

Clinicians:

  • Neurologists, primary care clinicians, pharmacists, or psychologists involved in dementia decision-making.
  • English or Spanish speaking
Exclusion Criteria

Patients:

  • Not English or Spanish-speaking
  • Neurocognitive deficits suggestive of moderate or severe cognitive impairment or late stage dementia.
  • Not able to consent for themselves

Caregiver:

  • Ages 17 y/o and below
  • Not English or Spanish-speaking

Clinicians:

  • Neurologists, primary care clinicians, pharmacists, or psychologists involved in dementia decision-making.
  • English or Spanish-speaking

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Decisional ConflictFrom enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2

To access the preliminary efficacy on decisional conflict including personal perceptions of uncertainty in choosing options, factors that contribute to feelings of uncertainty and effective decision making.

Decisional Conflict Scale - Higher numbers mean more uncertainty. O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical decision making, 15(1), 25-30. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User\_Manuals/UM\_Decisional\_Conflict.pdf

Shared Decision MakingFrom enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2

To determine the extent that health care providers engage with patients as a part of their shared decision making, specifically looking at the discussion of treatment options and their pros and cons as well as the patient's preferences.

Shared Decision Making Process Scale - Higher numbers mean more shared decision making. https://mghdecisionsciences.org/tools-training/sdm-process-survey/

Decisional Self-EfficacyFrom enrollment at start of year 2 to the end of year 2

To determine the patient's perception of their self-efficacy in decision making including measuring their self-confidence in their ability to make decisions.

Decision Self-Efficacy Scale where higher numbers mean they patient has a higher perception of self-efficacy.

https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/Tools/Decision\_SelfEfficacy.pdf

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Colorado

🇺🇸

Aurora, Colorado, United States

University of Colorado
🇺🇸Aurora, Colorado, United States
Kaitlynn Walton, MPH
Contact
303-724-7162
kaitlynn.walton@cuanschutz.edu
Kate Noonan
Contact
kate.noonan@cuanschutz.edu
Daniel Matlock
Principal Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.