Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02937246
NCT02937246
Unknown
Not Applicable

Efficacy of Partial Covered Double Bare Metal Stent Compared to Uncovered Double Bare Metal Stent in Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial

Yonsei University1 site in 1 country260 target enrollmentMay 31, 2016
ConditionsMalignant Tumor

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Malignant Tumor
Sponsor
Yonsei University
Enrollment
260
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Mean duration of stent patency
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Previous studies indicated that covered stents are less likely to become occluded in comparison to bare stents. While the probability of occlusions caused by tumor in-growth is less in covered stents, they are more likely to spontaneously migrate to a position that is distal to the original deployment site. However, newer covered stents with improved designs, such as the partially covered double bare metallic stent used for this study, include features to mitigate the migration issue. The purpose of this study is to confirm whether the difference in patency rate between regular covered stents and bare stents, which has already been well established by existing studies, is also reproducible when double covered stents are compared against double bare stents.

Detailed Description

Malignant obstructive jaundice is a common complication of advanced stage cholangiocarcinoma, GB cancer, and pancreatic cancer. In biliary stricture by malignancy, biliary drainage with placement of self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) for palliation is the therapy of choice in these patients. When compared to plastic stents, SEMS present a significantly decreased risk of recurrent biliary obstruction. SEMS are also more cost-effective than plastic stents in patients with a life expectancy of longer than 4 months. However, despite their numerous benefits, SEMS become occluded in up to 50 % of patients in the first 6-8 months. In order to minimize the occurrence of this issue, covered stents were developed. Previous studies indicated that covered stents are less likely to become occluded in comparison to bare stents. While the probability of occlusions caused by tumor in-growth is less in covered stents, they are more likely to spontaneously migrate to a position that is distal to the original deployment site. However, newer covered stents with improved designs, such as the partially covered double bare metallic stent used for this study, include features to mitigate the migration issue. The purpose of this study is to confirm whether the difference in patency rate between regular covered stents and bare stents, which has already been well established by existing studies, is also reproducible when double covered stents are compared against double bare stents.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 31, 2016
End Date
December 2019
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Pathologically confirmed malignant biliary obstruction or clinically defined malignant biliary obstruction
  • malignant biliary obstruction was located more than 1cm from the hilum
  • older than 20 years old
  • Life expectancy \> 6 months
  • Inoperable case due to advanced stage or comorbidity
  • Informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inadequate case for ERCP
  • Failed endoscopic approach to duodenum or biliary tract
  • biliary obstruction was located at hilum or IHD
  • patients with uncontrolled infection
  • Pregnancy
  • No signed informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mean duration of stent patency

Time Frame: 6 months after stenting

Check the duration until the date of obstruction of inserted stent within 6 months after stenting

Secondary Outcomes

  • Patency rate of stent(6 months after stenting)
  • Overall survival(6 months after stenting)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials