NCT00280709
Completed
Phase 4
Covered Versus Uncovered Metal Stents for Management of Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction? Results of a Randomized Prospective Study.
University Hospital, Linkoeping1 site in 1 country400 target enrollmentJanuary 2006
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Bile Duct Obstruction
- Sponsor
- University Hospital, Linkoeping
- Enrollment
- 400
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Clinical follow-up every month, starting one month after stent insertion. Clinical and/or laboratory signs of stent dysfunction?
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 14 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The primary purpose is to compare patency of two different types of biliary metal stents, i.e. covered versus uncovered Nitinella metal stent. Secondary purposes are to determine frequency of complications in the two groups, e.g. cholecystitis, pancreatitis, and cholangitis.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •20 years of age or older
- •oral and written information given and informed consent obtained
- •clinical data in accordance with malignant bile duct obstruction
- •ultrasonography signs of extrahepatic malignant common bile duct obstruction
- •typical radiological findings at ERCP of malignant common bile duct stenosis
- •proximal margin of the bile duct stenosis at least 2 cm from the hepatic confluence
- •bilirubin \> 50 micromol/L
- •radical surgery estimated not possible (temporary stenting with insertion of a plastic stent can be obtained but should be replaced by a metal stent within 4 weeks after the first ERCP procedure, and the patient is randomized at the time of insertion of the metal stent)
Exclusion Criteria
- •patients with active hepatitis or other hepatic diseases that may cause jaundice
- •informed consent not obtained
- •metastasis with numerous significant intrahepatic stenosis causing blockage of one or more segments of the liver (if no segment blockage, liver metastasis is not an exclusion criteria)
- •the patient is probably a candidate for surgical resection
- •suspicion of a non-malignant bile duct obstruction, e.g. stones or benign stenosis (should initiate further investigations)
- •the proximal end of the stenosis is located within 2 cm from the hepatic confluence
- •the patient has previously undergone BII or Roux-en-Y gastric resection, or has a significant duodenal obstruction making ERCP difficult
- •previously (more than 4 weeks earlier) treated with a bile duct stent
- •severe coagulation disturbance (PK-INR \> 1.6)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Clinical follow-up every month, starting one month after stent insertion. Clinical and/or laboratory signs of stent dysfunction?
Time Frame: 12 months after stent insertion
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Covered versus uncovered metallic stents for palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: A multicenter randomized trial.nresectable malignant tumor causing gastric outlet obstructionJPRN-UMIN000013653Kawasaki Medical School380
Completed
Phase 3
A phase III study of covered versus bare metallic stents for the treatment of malignant bile duct obstruction (JIVROSG-0207)Malignant common bile duct obstructionJPRN-C000000043Japan Interventional Radiology in Oncology Study Group (JIVROSG)60
Completed
Not Applicable
Covered Versus Uncovered Biliary Stents for Biliary MalignanciesBiliary Tract CancerNCT02102984Nuovo Ospedale Civile S.Agostino Estense140
Completed
Not Applicable
Trial Comparing Metal Versus Plastic Stents for Preoperative Biliary DecompressionObstructive JaundicePancreatic CancerNCT01675908AdventHealth46
Completed
Not Applicable
Covered Versus Uncovered SEMS for Palliation of Malignant Biliary Strictures.Biliary CancerNCT02930252Azienda USL 1 Imperiese170