Comparison of Bier Block and a Lidocaine-Propofol Mixture for the Prevention of Propofol Injection Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical Trial
概览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- Asma Ladib
- 入组人数
- 180
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Incidence of pain during propofol injection
概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial was to evaluate methods to prevent pain on intravenous administration of propofol during induction of anesthesia. Propofol frequently causes a burning or painful sensation when injected into a peripheral vein.
This randomized study compared three approaches in adult patients scheduled for elective surgery: propofol alone (control), propofol with 40 mg lidocaine mixed directly, and a brief intravenous lidocaine under venous occlusion (Bier block) using 40 mg for 2 minutes before propofol.
The primary outcome was the incidence of pain on propofol injection measured with a 4-point verbal rating scale (0 = no pain to 3 = severe pain). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, peri-induction hemodynamic parameters, and local injection-site adverse effects.
详细描述
Study Design and Setting This study was designed as a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at the Maternity and Neonatology Center of Monastir (Tunisia). The trial was carried out between March 2025 and July 2025 in accordance with institutional standards for general anesthesia.
Study Procedures Upon arrival in the operating room, standard monitoring was applied, including non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiography, and pulse oximetry. A peripheral intravenous catheter was inserted in a vein of the upper limb used for propofol administration. No analgesic or sedative premedication was administered prior to induction.
Patients were allocated to one of three study groups according to a predefined randomization sequence. All study drugs were administered through the same intravenous access under standardized conditions.
In the control group, propofol was administered intravenously without lidocaine pretreatment. In the lidocaine-propofol mixture group, lidocaine was added directly to the propofol syringe immediately before injection. In the Bier block group, lidocaine was administered intravenously under venous occlusion using a tourniquet applied proximally for a short, predefined duration, followed by release of the tourniquet and intravenous administration of propofol.
Randomization and Blinding Randomization was performed using a block randomization method. Study syringes were prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in patient management or outcome assessment. Patients, anesthesia providers, investigators, and outcome assessors remained blinded to group allocation throughout the study.
Data Collection and Monitoring Pain during propofol injection was assessed immediately at the time of administration by an independent observer using a standardized verbal rating scale. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded at predefined time points during induction of anesthesia. Patients were monitored for local adverse effects at the injection site following propofol administration.
Ethical Considerations The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained prior to study initiation, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Both the participant and the investigator assessing pain were blinded to group allocation. The propofol syringes were prepared by an anesthesiologist not involved in data collection.
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Adult patients aged 18 years or older
- •American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I to III
- •Scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia requiring intravenous induction with propofol
排除标准
- •Patient refusal
- •Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetics or propofol
- •Pre-existing vascular disease
- •Infection at the intended injection site
- •Chronic use of analgesics or anxiolytics
- •Inability to understand the pain assessment scale
- •History of drug abuse
研究组 & 干预措施
Control Group - Propofol alone
Patients in this control arm received intravenous propofol at a dose of 2 mg/kg without any lidocaine pretreatment. Pain during propofol injection was evaluated, and results were used as the reference comparator for the two active investigational interventions.
干预措施: propofol (Drug)
Lidocaine-Propofol Mixture Group
Patients in this experimental arm received a mixture prepared by adding 40 mg of lidocaine directly into the propofol syringe immediately before intravenous administration. The total dose of propofol administered was 2 mg/kg. This intervention was evaluated relative to the control arm for its ability to reduce injection-related discomfort.
干预措施: Lidocaine - Propofol Mixture (Drug)
Bier Block Group - Intravenous Lidocaine under Venous Occlusion
Patients in this experimental arm received 40 mg of intravenous lidocaine administered under venous occlusion using a Bier block technique for approximately 2 minutes. After release of the tourniquet, propofol was administered intravenously at a dose of 2 mg/kg. This intervention was evaluated for its ability to reduce discomfort associated with propofol injection.
干预措施: Lidocaine - Bier Block (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
Incidence of pain during propofol injection
时间窗: Immediate (within 30 seconds after propofol injection)
Proportion of patients with any pain (score ≥1 on 4-point verbal rating scale).
次要结局
- Severity of pain during propofol injection(Immediate (during propofol injection))
- Change in mean arterial pressure after propofol injection(1 minute after propofol injection)
- Change in heart rate after propofol injection(1 minute after propofol injection)
- Local adverse effects at the injection site(Within 10 minutes after propofol injection)
研究者
Asma Ladib
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Critical Care
University of Monastir