MedPath

Molecular Signature for Breast Cancer

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Breast Cancer
Interventions
Other: Diagnostic assistance tool
Registration Number
NCT05724407
Lead Sponsor
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of a diagnostic assistance tool for analysis of 5 prognostic and predictive markers of breast cancer (HER2, Ki67 Index, Mitoses, Estrogen Hormone Receptor, Hormone Progesteron receptors hormone of Progesteronereceptor) integrating an automatic analysis algorithm compared to a reference (gold standard defined as the rereading by at least two different anatomopathologists according to the standard method of care) in order to show the non-inferiority of the automatic analysis algorithm compared to this gold standard.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
220
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients over 18 years of age
  • Understanding French
  • With symptoms of breast cancer that required a biopsy (microbiopsy or macrobiopsy or surgical biopsy) and pathological examination diagnosing breast cancer
  • First diagnosis of invasive breast cancercarcinoma
  • Affiliated to a social security system
  • Agreeing to participate in the study
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Not affiliated to the social security system
  • Minor or under legal protection
  • Patient with a history of breast cancer
  • Patient previously treated for breast cancer
  • Patient who has relapsed from breast cancer treatment
  • Non ductal or non lobular invasive breast cancer carcinoma
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Standard of careDiagnostic assistance toolFemale patient diagnosed for breast cancer
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Diagnostic performancesat inclusion

The diagnostic performance of the automatic marker scoring support tool will be assessed based on the pathologists' gold standard using sensitivity and specificity

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Duration of procedureat inclusion

Comparison of medical time spent reading the slide and establishing marker identification between the standard of care method (microscope and pathologist alone) and the automatic marker scoring support tool (MoSi4BCa)

Cognitive savingsat inclusion

The contribution of the tool in terms of cognitive savings will be evaluated using quantitative survey for the pathologists participating in the study.

Diagnostic performancesat inclusion

Diagnostic performances will be assessed using positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and C-index or Area Under the Curve

Organizational constraintsat inclusion

The organizational constraints of the integration of the solution will be evaluated using a specific questionnaire dedicated to the pathologists and laboratory technicians who participated in the implementation and preparation of the installations.

inter-rater agreementat inclusion

Agreement between pathologists will be assessed using using Kappa coefficient or intraclass correlation coefficient

General comfort of useat inclusion

The contribution of the tool in terms of general comfort of use will be evaluated using quantitative survey for the pathologists participating in the study.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath