Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) using conventional fluoroscopy and 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation - a prospective, randomized comparative study regarding radiation exposure as well as radiological and clinical results.
- Conditions
- M53.26M43.16M43.17M43.06M47.26
- Registration Number
- DRKS00004514
- Lead Sponsor
- eurochirurgische Universitätsklinik Freiburg
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
• Full age to competent patients with planned mono- or bisegmental MIS TLIF between LWK 2 and SWK 1 due to degeneration and / or instability including spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade I and II.
• Both imaging techniques are considered suitable for MIS TLIF.
• No improvement in symptoms for at least 3 months under conservative treatment.
• Pain score (VAS for low back pain) of at least 3/10.
• Previous surgery in the affected or directly adjacent vertebral segment.
• Spondylodiscitis, traumatic instability, osteoporotic vertebral fractures, neoplastic disease of the operating segment(s), spondylolisthesis Meyerding grade III and IV.
• Indication for stabilization > 2 segments.
• One of the imaging techniques is not considered suitable for MIS TLIF.
• Scoliosis with a Cobb angle > 10 ° in the operating segment(s).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff and patient per monosegmental MIS TLIF in the FLUORO and NAV group (measured with dosimeters)
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method - Radiation exposure of patients with bisegmental MIS TLIF in the FLUORO and NAV group<br>- Radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff and patient depending on the body mass index (BMI) of patients in the FLUORO and NAV group<br>- Radiation exposure of the surgeon, operating room staff and patient per MIS TLIF with or without cement augmentation<br>- Clinical outcome (examination findings, questionnaires), fusion rate (follow-up, 12 months)<br>- Comparison of the accuracy of pedicle screws in the FLUORO and NAV group<br>- Comparison of the parameters of the sagittal balance (C7 plumb line, segmental / lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence) between follow-up (12 months) and preoperatively in the FLUORO and NAV group in lateral X-rays