MedPath

Non-invasive Evaluation of Graft Condition in Adult Patients With Kidney Transplant Using Ultrasound Localization Microscopy and Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography

Recruiting
Conditions
Kidney Biopsy
Kidney Transplant
Interventions
Device: ULM and MSOT
Registration Number
NCT06472947
Lead Sponsor
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical School
Brief Summary

In this study, the condition of the kidney transplant in adults is to be assessed non-invasively using Multispectral Optoacoustic Tomography and Ultrasound Localization Microscopy. New, non-invasive markers that allow conclusions to be drawn about the condition of the transplant should reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures in the future.

Detailed Description

In this study, the condition of the kidney transplant in adults is to be assessed non-invasively using multispectral multispectral optoacoustic tomography and ultrasound localization microscopy. Associated with common diseases such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases, chronic renal failure is now a leading cause of death worldwide.

Around 10% of adults in Germany, but children are also affected. The terminal stage of renal insufficiency is defined by a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) which is only 15% of the normal rate and the need for renal replacement therapy in the form of dialysis or transplantation.

Not only the higher quality of life, but also the mortality rate make kidney transplantation the procedure of choice whenever possible.

After successful kidney transplantation, regular monitoring and evaluation of the organ transplant is of great importance to detect a rejection reaction as early as possible.

Among other things, this is done during an extensive annual examination. Not infrequently, and especially in the case of abnormalities in the laboratory diagnosis of blood and urine, a kidney biopsy is also necessary in order to assess the condition of the transplant in the best possible way.

As an invasive diagnostic procedure, the biopsy necessitates a stay in hospital, may result in side effects such as postoperative bleeding and represents a risk and an additional bruden for the patient.

MSOT has already been used to measure renal clearance and the biodistribution of fluorescent substances within the kidney, but new biomarkers have also been established in muscle and intestinal diseases and correlated with clinical scores. ULM has made the visualization of glomeruli, the smallest functional unit of the kidney, in living rats and humans and visualization of cerebral microvasculature in the human brain possible. In this study, the renal function in transplant patients will be evaluated as part of the annual examination and results from histology (biopsy), laboratory and ultrasound diagnostics will be correlated with data from MSOT and ULM imaging.

The investigators believe that MSOT can be used to gain important molecular insights into the condition of the transplant. With ULM the investigators want to analyze the microvascular architecture within glomerular renal corpuscles and identify changes in perfusion dynamics as morphological signs for transplant evaluation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • kidney transplant
  • indication for biopsy set in clinical routine
  • minimum 18 years of age
  • written consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • allergy against contrast agents/ SonoVue
  • tatoos in examined areas
  • contraindication against SonoVue
  • pregnant women
  • breast feeding women

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Patient with kidney transplantULM and MSOTIncluded are adult (\> 18 years) patients with kidney transplant where the indication for a kidney biopsy has been set during clinical routine
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MSOT in human kidney transplantDay1

Measuring MSOT signals (Signals for total/oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin, lipid and collagen) in the human kidney transplant

Quantification of microvascular dynamics in the transplanted kidneyDay1

Using Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (ULM) for the non invasive quantification of microvascular dynamics

Visualization of microvascular architecture in the transplant kidneyDay1

Using Ultrasound Localization Microscopy (ULM) for the non invasive visualization of microvasculature

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
MSOT Lipid and laboratory resultsDay1

- MSOT: Correlation of the signal for lipid determined with MSOT with laboratory chemical parameters

MSOT collagen and histologyDay1

MSOT: Correlation of the signal for collagen determined with MSOT with histological parameters

ULM quantification and sonographyDay1

Correlation of parameters of the quantified microvascular perfusion dynamics in the transplant kidney with sonography in transplanted kidney

ULM visuals and laboratory resultsDay1

- ULM: Correlation of the vascular architecture of the transplant kidney visualized by ULM (e.g. number of segmented glomeruli) with laboratory chemical parameters (e.g. renal function parameters, inflammation parameters, immunological parameters)

ULM visuals and standard sonographyDay1

- ULM: Correlation of the vascular architecture of the transplant kidney visualized by ULM (e.g. number of segmented glomeruli) with sonographic parameters (e.g. resistance index (RI), flow velocity)

ULM quantification and laboratory resultsDay1

- ULM: Correlation of parameters of the quantified microvascular perfusion dynamics in the transplant kidney with laboratory chemical parameters (including renal function parameters, inflammation parameters)

ULM visuals and histologyDay1

ULM: Correlation of the vascular architecture of the transplant kidney visualized by ULM (e.g. number of segmented glomeruli) with histological parameters (e.g. Banff classification)

ULM quantification and histologyDay1

ULM: Correlation of parameters of quantified microvascular perfusion dynamics in the transplant kidney with histological parameters (e.g. Banff classification)

MSOT: hb and laboratory resultsDay1

- MSOT: Correlation of the signal for total/oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin with laboratory chemical parameters

MSOT hb and sonographyDay1

- MSOT: Correlation of the signal for total/oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin determined with MSOT with sonographic parameters

MSOT hb and histologyDay1

- MSOT: Correlation of the signal for total/oxygenated/deoxygenated hemoglobin with with histological parameters

MSOT: Hb and histologyDay1

MSOT: Correlation of the signal determined with MSOT for total/oxygenated/deoxygenated

MSOT Lipid and sonographic resultsDay1

MSOT: Correlation of the signal for lipid determined with MSOT with sonographic parameters parameters

MSOT lipid and histologyDay1

MSOT: Correlation of the signal for lipid determined with MSOT with histological parameters

MSOT collagen and sonographyDay1

- MSOT: Correlation of the signal for collagen determined with MSOT with sonographic parameters

MSOT collagen and laboratory resultsDay1

- MSOT: Correlation of the signal for collagen determined with MSOT with laboratory chemical parameters

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

🇩🇪

Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath