跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07338591
NCT07338591尚未招募不适用

Digital vs. Analog Inputs in CAD/CAM Orthodontics: A Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Palatal Expander Fabrication Workflow

Mansoura University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2025年12月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
36
试验地点
2
主要终点
Clinical Fit and accuracy of expander

研究概览

简要总结

36 patients with unilateral or bilateral cross bite treated with hyrax expanders fabricated through three distinct workflows: fully conventional (physical impression + manual fabrication), hybrid (physical impression + CAD/CAM fabrication), and fully digital (intraoral scanning + CAD/CAM fabrication). To evaluate and compare the clinical fit, workflow efficiency, and patient/clinician satisfaction of palatal expanders fabricated using traditional, hybrid digital, and fully digital workflows.

详细描述

This randomized, three-arm clinical trial aims to compare the clinical performance and workflow efficiency of tooth-borne palatal expanders fabricated using three different manufacturing workflows: fully conventional, hybrid digital, and fully digital. The study evaluates the impact of these workflows on appliance fit at delivery, efficiency of clinical and laboratory procedures, and patient- and clinician-reported satisfaction.

Following enrollment, participants will be randomly allocated into one of three equal groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence. All appliances used in the study will be Hyrax-type maxillary expanders designed to deliver comparable transverse expansion forces, with differences limited to the fabrication workflow.

In the fully conventional workflow, maxillary impressions will be obtained using conventional impression materials. Dental stone casts will be poured and used directly for appliance fabrication. The Hyrax expander will be manually fabricated on the physical cast using traditional laboratory techniques, including wire bending, band adaptation, and soldering or brazing of the expansion screw and components.

In the hybrid digital workflow, maxillary impressions will also be taken using conventional impression materials and poured in dental stone. The resulting physical casts will then be digitized using a desktop optical scanner. The scanned models will be imported into computer-aided design (CAD) software, where the palatal expander will be digitally designed. Appliance fabrication will be completed using additive manufacturing (3D printing), followed by incorporation of the expansion screw as required.

In the fully digital workflow, maxillary arches will be captured directly using an intraoral optical scanner. The generated virtual models will be used without producing a physical cast. Appliance design will be performed entirely within CAD software, and the Hyrax-type expander will be fabricated using 3D printing technology.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
8 Months 至 13 Months(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • • Aged between 8 and 13 years with transverse maxillary deficiency ( with unilateral or bilateral crossbite ,with or without anterior cross bite)
  • Indicated for tooth-borne maxillary expansion
  • Good oral hygiene and cooperative behavior
  • No prior orthodontic treatment

排除标准

  • • Craniofacial anomalies or syndromes
  • Requirement for surgically assisted expansion
  • Poor oral hygiene or high caries index

研究组 & 干预措施

Hybrid Workflow

  • Input: Physical impression
  • Model: Poured in dental stone to produce physical model.
  • Digitization: Desktop scanning of physical model
  • Fabrication: CAD-designed and 3D-printed appliance (Hyrax-type),

Fully Digital Workflow

  • Input: Intraoral scan (IOS) using an optical scanner
  • Model: Virtual model used directly in design software.
  • Fabrication: CAD-designed and 3D-printed appliance (Hyrax-type),

Fully Analogue Workflow

  • Input: Physical impression.
  • Model: Poured in dental stone to produce physical model.
  • Fabrication: Hyrax expander fabricated manually by soldering/brazing components directly on the plaster cast using traditional laboratory techniques.

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical Fit and accuracy of expander

时间窗: Immediately after appliance insertion

For the clinical fit of the palatal expander at delivery, a 5-point Likert scale could be used by the clinician as follows: Score Description 1. Very poor fit - Significant rocking or instability; requires remake 2. Poor fit - Major adjustment required (e.g., soldering, bending) 3. Acceptable fit - Minor chairside adjustments needed 4. Good fit - Minimal adjustment required 5. Excellent fit - No adjustment needed, passive and accurate seating

次要结局

  • Workflow and Chairside adjustment time(Immediately after appliance insertion)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Digital vs. Analog Inputs in CAD/CAM Orthodontics: A... | 临床试验