Comparison of two second generation Supraglottic Airways for placement and intubation-Blockbuster and Igel
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: O- Medical and Surgical
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/05/067376
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anaesthesiology, IPGMER
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1. Adult patient undergoing elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia requiring intubation
2. patients who have given written informed consent to participate in this study
Exclusion Criteria
1. known congenital deformity/syndrome.
2. oropharyngeal pathology.
3. Craniofacial anomalies.
4. patient at higher risk of pulmonary aspiration.
5. patient with known cardiovascular, pulmonary,
hepatic, renal, neurological,
endocrinologicaldisease.
6. A known/predicted difficult airway
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Comparative effectiveness second-generation supraglottic airways endotracheal intubation success rates complications
Complications supraglottic airway devices fiberoptic intubation aspiration sore throat nerve injury
Predictors difficult supraglottic airway placement intubation Mallampati score thyromental distance BMI
Supraglottic airway guided intubation versus video laryngoscopy direct laryngoscopy outcomes
Performance comparison Blockbuster LMA versus I-gel LMA oropharyngeal leak pressure insertion time