跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01372371
NCT01372371Unknown不适用

Effects of Applying Powdered Prophylactics Verses Intravenous Antibiotics Only on Post-operative Infection Rate

Ganga Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 1,844 人开始时间: 2011年6月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
1,844
试验地点
2
主要终点
Infection percent after surgery

研究概览

简要总结

Hypothesis: Directly applying antibiotic powder onto the site of surgery along with perioperative intravenous antibiotics, before closing the wound, is more effective than intravenously applied perioperative antibiotics alone in controlling post-operative wound infection. The investigators also think powders that control both gram positive and gram negative bacteria are more beneficial.

详细描述

  1. Subjects will be divided into three groups based on the procedure used for the application of antibiotics

  2. No local antibiotics (control group): In this group, individuals will be subjected to peri-operative intravenous* antibiotics only

  3. Gram positive antibiotic: In this group, gram positive (powdered vancomycin)+ will be applied to the site of surgery, before closure of the wound, along with peri-operative intravenous antibiotics*

  4. Gram positive and gram negative: In this group, gram positive (powdered vancomycin) will be instilled on the site of surgery, before closing the wound, and gram negative antibiotic (gentamycin mixed with bone cement)+ will be used, along with peri-operative intravenous antibiotics* (only in cases of implant fixation).

  • Intravenous antibiotic dosage: 1 pre-operative dose of Cefuroxime 1.5 gm and 2 post-operative doses of Cefuroxime 750 mg.

  • Vancomycin and Gentamycin dosage: 500 mg of vancomycin powder will be used and in group 'c' gentamycin mixed with bone cement will be used along with vancomycin powder.

  1. Sample size: Based on, finding at least 4% difference between the proportions of infections found in control (generally 5%, 4% in case of joint replacement) and case groups (1%) (proportions were assumed from literature and our institute records), a sample size of minimum 285 in each group (424 for joint replacement cases) will be considered for the observation to be significant at an alpha level of 0.05. This will give the study a minimum power of 80%.

Spine cases: Control = 143, Gram-P = 143; Trauma cases: Control = 143, Gram-P = 143; Joint replacement cases: Control = 424, Gram-P = 424, Gram-P+Gram-N = 424; Total = 1844; Where Control - Cases with intravenous antibiotic dose; Gram-P - Cases with intravenous antibiotic + local antibiotic (Vancomycin, acts against gram positive bacteria); Gram-N - Cases with intravenous antibiotic + local antibiotic (Vancomycin, acts against gram positive bacteria) + local Gentamycin cement (acts against gram negative bacteria). 3. Procedure: Sampling will be based on stratified procedure. The total sample will be divided into categories based on the type of surgery, which are spine, trauma and joint replacement. Subjects within each category will be randomly selected for the three antibiotic treatments. For this study, we will use computer software to generate restricted randomization to achieve balance between groups in size. Within this restricted randomization, single block random size will be used to ensure randomization within each group.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
10 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • All joint replacement patients
  • All non infected spine patients
  • Hemiarthroplasty, All upper limb plating of closed fractures

排除标准

  • Open injuries in trauma
  • Revision joint replacement surgeries
  • Patients with suspicion of existing infection

结局指标

主要结局

Infection percent after surgery

时间窗: Within one year after surgery

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验