Evaluation of Respiratory Acoustic Monitor in Children After Surgery
- Conditions
- Respiratory ComplicationsPediatric
- Interventions
- Device: Respiratory Acoustic Monitor
- Registration Number
- NCT02256384
- Lead Sponsor
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
- Brief Summary
The study will evaluate the performance of measuring respiration rate with the Respiratory Acoustic Monitoring (RAM).
- Detailed Description
The study seeks to determine the reliability and accuracy of the acoustic respiratory monitoring (RAM) in comparison of clinically completed transthoracic impedance monitoring (TI) and manual counting of respiratory rate in postoperative pediatric patients at risk of adverse respiratory events.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 76
- Male or female children 2 to 16 years of age
- In-patients or 23 hour short stay patients who had a tonsillectomy with a diagnosis or symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea or who had any surgery and receiving an opioid by patient controlled analgesia for post-operative pain control
- Child weighs at least 10 kg on day of surgery
- Patient has skin abnormalities (rash, eczema, etc.) at the planned application sites that would interfere with sensor or electrode applications.
- Patient is admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
- Patient has tracheostomy
- Patient is on non-invasive ventilator support
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Respiratory Acoustic Monitoring Respiratory Acoustic Monitor All participants will wear the respiratory acoustic monitoring device.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Reliability/ Accuracy of Respiratory Acoustic Monitoring (RAM) Up to 24 hours after surgery The respiratory acoustic monitor records three vital signs: Respiration rate recorded in breaths per minute, oxygen saturation recorded in percentage, and heart rate recorded in beats per minute.
The reliability and accuracy of the respiratory data collected by the RAM was examined by comparing to data collected clinically by the manual counting of the respiratory rate and by the respiratory rate measure by transthoracic impedance . The accuracy of RAM was examined when a staff member goes and register these measurements that occur simultaneously during the first minute of every 2 hour interval to a maximum of a 24 hour monitoring time.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence of False Alarms Up to 24 hours after surgery To evaluate the presence of false alarms, bedside clinical monitoring was done every two hour during 5 to 15 minutes (random sample) recording the respiratory rates and evaluating the presence of alarms. If an alarm was activated during the bedside monitoring, it was verified by the investigator if the respiratory rate provided by the device was consistent with the clinical evaluation. False alarms were considered those alarms that are triggered by the device, but during simultaneous clinical evaluation it was verified that the number of breaths per minute were inaccurate. Therefore, the higher number of false alarms detected by one type of monitoring indicates that the device is less reliable detecting the respiratory rate.
Tolerance of the RAM Up to 24 hours after surgery The tolerance is defined as the ratio of the time the sensor stays in place divided by the total expected time of monitoring, expressed as a percentage. The tolerance to the transthoracic impedance pads was not evaluated during this study considering that this is the standard monitoring and that is usually tolerated during the total expected time of monitoring.
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
UT Southwestern Medical Center - Dallas
🇺🇸Dallas, Texas, United States