跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05216640
NCT05216640Unknown不适用

High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus High Velocity Nasal Insufflation in Covid-19 Patients Admitted to Respiratory Intensive Care Unit of Assiut University Hospital

Assiut University0 个研究点目标入组 50 人开始时间: 2022年3月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
50
主要终点
delay between admission and intubation.

研究概览

简要总结

To compare the outcomes of HFNC and HVNI in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure as regard need for mechanical ventilation, changes of arterial blood gases (ABG) parameters, duration of ventilatory support and delay between admission and intubation

详细描述

novel clinical syndrome caused by a previously unknown coronavirus, SARS-Cov-2, was first identified in Wuhan (China) in December 2019. Despite massive efforts to contain viral transmission, a worldwide epidemic has developed from this virus. This disease is presently known as COVID-19 COVID-19 pandemic reached over 45 million confirmed infections and claimed the lives of more than 1.2 million people worldwide. The clinical features of COVID-19 are diverse and range from asymptomatic to critical illness and death. Severe and critical cases represented 14% and 5% of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients and need ICU admission Several non-invasive options exist to support COVID-19 patients with mild or moderate respiratory distress and may reduce the numbers of patients requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation in some severely ill patients such as High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) includes high flow nasal cannula and high velocity nasal insufflation. High flow oxygen systems provide oxygen-rich heated humidified gas to the patient's nose at flow levels sufficient to deliver a constant, precisely set high FiO2. Exhalation is to the open air. HFNO reduces dead space, provides low levels of PEEP, and decreases breathing frequency and work of breathing HFNC flow rates reach up to 60 L/min, whereas HVNI delivers flow rates up to 40 L/min due to differing mechanisms of delivery (4).

High velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) utilizes a small-bore nasal cannula to generate higher velocities of gas delivery than HFNC which uses large bore cannula

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • COVID-19 positive by RT-PCR
  • Age≥ 18 years
  • Both gender
  • Classical radiological lesions of COVID-19 on HRCT chest.
  • Respiratory rate > 30/ min and not responding to non-rebreather masks.
  • COVID-related pneumonia requiring non-invasive ventilatory support (high-flow nasal cannula, and / or non-invasive ventilation and / or CPAP)

排除标准

  • Age < 18 years
  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study
  • Severe respiratory failure requiring invasive ventilatory support
  • Indication of immediate tracheal intubation
  • Significant acute progressive circulatory insufficiency
  • Impaired conscious level
  • Nasal blockade

结局指标

主要结局

delay between admission and intubation.

时间窗: baseline

delay between admission and intubation.

To compare the outcomes of HFNC and HVNI in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure

时间窗: baseline

need for mechanical ventilation

changes of arterial blood gases (ABG) parameters

时间窗: within 2 hours then according to clinical condition

changes of arterial blood gases (ABG) parameters

duration of ventilatory support

时间窗: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months

duration of ventilatory support

次要结局

  • mortality rate(baseline)
  • To evaluate the length of ICU stay and mortality rate in HFNC versus HVNI in COVID-19 patients(baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Basma Abd ElAziz Mohammed

Resident doctor

Assiut University

相似试验