High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus High Velocity Nasal Insufflation in Covid-19 Patients Admitted to Respiratory Intensive Care Unit of Assiut University Hospital
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 入组人数
- 50
- 主要终点
- delay between admission and intubation.
研究概览
简要总结
To compare the outcomes of HFNC and HVNI in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure as regard need for mechanical ventilation, changes of arterial blood gases (ABG) parameters, duration of ventilatory support and delay between admission and intubation
详细描述
novel clinical syndrome caused by a previously unknown coronavirus, SARS-Cov-2, was first identified in Wuhan (China) in December 2019. Despite massive efforts to contain viral transmission, a worldwide epidemic has developed from this virus. This disease is presently known as COVID-19 COVID-19 pandemic reached over 45 million confirmed infections and claimed the lives of more than 1.2 million people worldwide. The clinical features of COVID-19 are diverse and range from asymptomatic to critical illness and death. Severe and critical cases represented 14% and 5% of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients and need ICU admission Several non-invasive options exist to support COVID-19 patients with mild or moderate respiratory distress and may reduce the numbers of patients requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation in some severely ill patients such as High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) High flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) includes high flow nasal cannula and high velocity nasal insufflation. High flow oxygen systems provide oxygen-rich heated humidified gas to the patient's nose at flow levels sufficient to deliver a constant, precisely set high FiO2. Exhalation is to the open air. HFNO reduces dead space, provides low levels of PEEP, and decreases breathing frequency and work of breathing HFNC flow rates reach up to 60 L/min, whereas HVNI delivers flow rates up to 40 L/min due to differing mechanisms of delivery (4).
High velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) utilizes a small-bore nasal cannula to generate higher velocities of gas delivery than HFNC which uses large bore cannula
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •COVID-19 positive by RT-PCR
- •Age≥ 18 years
- •Both gender
- •Classical radiological lesions of COVID-19 on HRCT chest.
- •Respiratory rate > 30/ min and not responding to non-rebreather masks.
- •COVID-related pneumonia requiring non-invasive ventilatory support (high-flow nasal cannula, and / or non-invasive ventilation and / or CPAP)
排除标准
- •Age < 18 years
- •Patients who refuse to participate in the study
- •Severe respiratory failure requiring invasive ventilatory support
- •Indication of immediate tracheal intubation
- •Significant acute progressive circulatory insufficiency
- •Impaired conscious level
- •Nasal blockade
结局指标
主要结局
delay between admission and intubation.
时间窗: baseline
delay between admission and intubation.
To compare the outcomes of HFNC and HVNI in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure
时间窗: baseline
need for mechanical ventilation
changes of arterial blood gases (ABG) parameters
时间窗: within 2 hours then according to clinical condition
changes of arterial blood gases (ABG) parameters
duration of ventilatory support
时间窗: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 100 months
duration of ventilatory support
次要结局
- mortality rate(baseline)
- To evaluate the length of ICU stay and mortality rate in HFNC versus HVNI in COVID-19 patients(baseline)
研究者
Basma Abd ElAziz Mohammed
Resident doctor
Assiut University
