MedPath

Study Of The Effectiveness & Safety Of Lenalidomide Versus Chlorambucil As First Line Therapy For Elderly Patients With B-Cell CLL (The ORIGIN Trial)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00910910
Lead Sponsor
Celgene
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide as a first line therapy in treating patients with B-cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. This study will compare the effects (good and bad) of lenalidomide with chlorambucil.

Detailed Description

After notification from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on 12 July 2013, Celgene agreed to discontinue the lenalidomide treatment for all patients due to an imbalance in the number of deaths in patients treated with lenalidomide versus patients treated with chlorambucil. No specific causality for this imbalance has been identified to date. Investigators were instructed to immediately discontinue all participants from experimental lenalidomide treatment and inform their patients accordingly. Participants on the Chlorambucil arm may continue up to 12 months (13 cycles) with the last participant completing in March 2014. All randomized participants will continue to be followed for overall survival and secondary primary malignancies.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
450
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Must sign an informed consent form.
  2. Age ≥ 65 years
  3. Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements.
  4. Must have a documented diagnosis of B-cell CLL.
  5. Must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of ≤2.
  6. Must agree to follow pregnancy precautions as required by the protocol.
  7. Must agree to receive counseling related to teratogenic and other risks of lenalidomide.
  8. Must agree not to donate blood or semen as defined by the protocol
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Prior treatment for B-cell CLL.

  2. Any medical condition, that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form.

  3. Active infections requiring systemic antibiotics.

  4. Systemic infection that has not resolved > 2 months prior to initiating lenalidomide

  5. Pregnant or lactating females.

  6. Participation in any clinical study or having taken any investigational therapy within 28 days.

  7. Known presence of alcohol and/or drug abuse.

  8. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement.

  9. Prior history of malignancies, other than CLL, unless the subject has been free of the disease for ≥3 years. Exceptions include the following:

    • Basal cell carcinoma of the skin
    • Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
    • Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
    • Carcinoma in situ of the breast
    • Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (TNM stage of T1a or T1b)
  10. History of renal failure requiring dialysis.

  11. Known Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and/or Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection.

  12. Prior therapy with lenalidomide.

  13. Evidence of TLS at screening

  14. Presence of specific hematology and/or chemistry abnormalities

  15. Uncontrolled hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism

  16. Venous thromboembolism within one year

  17. ≥ Grade-2 neuropathy

  18. Uncontrolled autoimmune hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia

  19. Disease transformation [i.e. Richter's Syndrome (lymphomas) or prolymphocytic leukemia]

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1 - LenalidomideLenalidomide1 - Lenalidomide
2- ChlorambucilChlorambucil2- Chlorambucil
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS)From first dose of study drug to date of data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 months

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed per investigator's assessment or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. The progression date was assigned to the earliest time when any progression was observed without prior missing assessments. If withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up occurred before documented progression or death, then these observations were censored at the date when the last complete tumor assessments determined a lack of progression

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Progression Free Survival (PFS) With a Later Cut-off Date of 14 March 2014From randomization to data cut off date of 31 March 2014; median follow up time for all participants was 12.6 months

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to the first documented progression confirmed per investigator's assessment or death due to any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Progressive disease included lymphadenopathy, an appearance of any new lesion such as enlarged lymph nodes (\> 1.5 cm), splenomegaly, hepatomegaly or other organ infiltrates, an increase by 50% or more in greatest determined diameter of any previous site or an increase by 50% or more in the sum of the product of diameters of multiple nodes. The progression date was assigned to the earliest time when any progression was observed without prior missing assessments. If withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up occurred before documented progression or death, then these observations were censored at the date when the last complete tumor assessments determined a lack of progression.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Participants With Adverse Events With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014From randomization to the data cut-off date of 31 March 2014; Up to 53 months; maximum duration of exposure for Lenalidomide was 1140 days and 406 days for Chlorambucil

AEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

Percentage of Participants With the Best Overall Response Based on the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL) GuidelinesUp to data cut-off date of 18 Feb 2013; approximately 39 months

A best overall response rate is a CR, CRi, nPR or PR and is defined as:

Complete Remission (CR):

* No lymphadenopathy

* No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly

* Absence of constitutional symptoms

* Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul

* No circulating clonal B-lymphocytes

* Platelets \> 100,000/ul

* Hemoglobin \> 11.0 g/dl

* Normocellular \<30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules;

Incomplete Clinical Response (CRi):

• CR without bone marrow biopsy confirmation.

Nodular Partial Response (nPR):

• CR with the presence of residual clonal nodules.

Partial Response (PR) requires:

* ≥ 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count

* ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy

* ≥ 50% reduction in size of liver and/or spleen

* 1 or more of the following:

* Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul

* Platelets \>100,000/ul

Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response Based on IWCLL Guidelines With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; approximately 53 months

A best overall response rate is a CR, CRi, nPR or PR and is defined as:

Complete Remission (CR):

* No lymphadenopathy

* No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly

* Absence of constitutional symptoms

* Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul

* No circulating clonal B-lymphocytes

* Platelets \> 100,000/ul

* Hemoglobin \> 11.0 g/dl

* Normocellular \<30% lymphocytes, no B-lymphoid nodules;

Incomplete Clinical Response (CRi):

• CR without bone marrow biopsy confirmation.

Nodular Partial Response:

• CR with the presence of residual clonal nodules.

Partial Response requires:

* ≥ 50% decrease in peripheral blood lymphocyte count

* ≥ 50% reduction in lymphadenopathy

* ≥ 50% reduction in size of liver and/or spleen

* 1 or more of the following:

* Polymorphonuclear leukocytes ≥ 1500/ul

* Platelets \>100,000/ul

Time to Response for a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; up to approximately 53 months

Time to response was calculated as the time from randomization to the first nPR, PR, CRi or CR based on IWCLL guidelines

Kaplan Meier Estimate for Overall Survival at the Final AnalysisUp to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 months

Overall Survival is defined as the time between randomization and death from any cause. Overall survival was censored at the last date that the subject was known to be alive for participants who were alive as of the data cutoff date and for participants who were lost to follow-up before death was documented.

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From randomization up to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; Up to approximately 39 months; maximum duration of exposure for Lenalidomide was 1086 days and 406 days for Chlorambucil

AEs = any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the course of a study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the participant's health, regardless of cause. Serious AE (SAE) = any AE which results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect; constitutes an important medical event. The severity of AEs were graded based upon the participants symptoms according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, Version 4.0); AEs were evaluated for severity according to the following scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; no medical intervention required; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Life threatening; Grade 5 = Death

Time to ResponseUp to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 months

Time to response was calculated as the time from randomization to the first nPR, PR, CRi or CR based on IWCLL guidelines

Kaplan Meier Estimate of Overall SurvivalUp to data cut off of 31 March 2014; median follow-up for all participants was 18.8 months

Overall Survival is defined as the time between randomization and death from any cause.

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of Response With a Later Cut-off Date of 31 March 2014Up to data cut-off of 31 March 2014; up to approximately 53 months

Duration of response was defined as the time from first nPR, PR, CRi, or CR to PD. Duration of response was censored at the last date that the patient was known to be progression-free for: 1) patients who had not progressed at the time of analysis; 2) patients who had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up prior to documentation of progression

Kaplan-Meier Estimate for Duration of ResponseUp to data cut-off of 18 Feb 2013; up to approximately 39 months

Duration of response was defined as the time from first nPR, PR, CRi, or CR to PD. Duration of response was censored at the last date that the patient was known to be progression-free for: 1) participants who had not progressed at the time of analysis; 2) participants who had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up prior to documentation of progression

Number of Participants and Types of Subsequent Anti-cancer Therapies Received Post TreatmentUp to the last patient last visit date of 19 May 2018; median follow-up for all participants was 46.7 months

Subsequent anti-cancer therapies administered to participants following the discontinuation of study drug (either Lenalidomide or Chlorambucil)

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to Create the FACT-Leukemia (FACT-Leu) Quality of Life InstrumentDay 1 and once every 8 weeks

The FACT-Leu scale is a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of leukemia-specific health-related quality of life for acute and chronic disease. The FACT-Leu is described as including 27 items that assess 17 physical symptoms (fevers, bleeding, general pain, stomach pain, chills, night sweats, bruising, lymph node swelling, weakness, tiredness, weight loss, appetite, shortness of breath, functional ability, diarrhea, concentration, and mouth sores) and 10 emotional/social concerns (frustration with activity limitation, discouraged by illness, future planning, uncertainty, worry about illness, emotional lability, isolation, infertility concern, family worry, and worry about infections).

Euro Quality of Life Five Dimension (EQ-5D) QuestionnaireDay 1 and once every 8 weeks

The standardized extended version of EQ-5D was designed for the collection of health state values using a visual analogue scale (VAS) rating scale - a vertical 20 cm visual analogue scale with the end points labeled best imaginable health state at the top and worst imaginable health state at the bottom having numeric values of 100 and 0 respectively. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking (or placing a cross) in the box against the most appropriate statement in each of the 5 dimensions.

Trial Locations

Locations (165)

California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence cCARE

🇺🇸

Escondido, California, United States

Innovative Clinical Research Institute

🇺🇸

Whittier, California, United States

The Hospital of Central Connecticut

🇺🇸

New Britain, Connecticut, United States

Cancer Center of Central Connecticut

🇺🇸

Southington, Connecticut, United States

University Hematology Oncology Inc.

🇺🇸

Centralia, Illinois, United States

North Chicago VA Medical Center

🇺🇸

North Chicago, Illinois, United States

Medical Consultants, PC

🇺🇸

Muncie, Indiana, United States

Floyd Memorial Cancer Center of Indiana, a division of Floyd Memorial Hospital and Health Services

🇺🇸

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Purchase Cancer Group

🇺🇸

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

University of Minnesota

🇺🇸

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Scroll for more (155 remaining)
California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence cCARE
🇺🇸Escondido, California, United States
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath