MedPath

Comparison of two plasma derivates as pulpotomy agents in human immature molars

Phase 1
Registration Number
CTRI/2020/06/025938
Lead Sponsor
Terna Dental College
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ot Yet Recruiting
Sex
Not specified
Target Recruitment
0
Inclusion Criteria

1. Large carious or mechanical exposure (more than 1 mm) of the vital coronal pulp

2. Absence of symptoms indicative of advanced pulpal inflammation such as spontaneous pain or history of nocturnal pain

3. Absence of clinical signs or symptoms suggesting a nonvital tooth such as suppurating sinus, soft tissue swelling.

4. Restorable tooth structure.

5. Bleeding should be controlled from the amputated pulp stumps within 5 minutes using sterile moist cotton pellets.

6. No evidence of external and/or internal root resorption

7. No widening of periodontal ligament (PDL) space

8. Absence of furcal or periapical radiolucency

9. Absence of canal calcification or pulp stone.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Uncontrolled bleeding during the amputation of coronal pulp tissue

2. Children with medical conditions or any associated systemic condition

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of clinical success of PRP and PRFTimepoint: 3 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Comparison of clinical and radiographic success of PRP and PRFTimepoint: 6 months and 12 months
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath