Clinical Comparison of Two Silicone-Hydrogel Contact Lenses
- Conditions
- Refractive Error
- Interventions
- Device: galyfilcon ADevice: comfilcon A
- Registration Number
- NCT00762385
- Lead Sponsor
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of two silicone-hydrogel contact lenses.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 97
- The subject must be at least 18 and less than or equal to 39 years of age and have a need for vision correction in both eyes.
- The subject must require a lens power between -1.00 to -6.00D and have no more than 1.00D of corneal cylinder.
- The subject, based on his/her knowledge, must be in good general health.
- The subject must be able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this protocol and complete all specified evaluations.
- Subject must be a current adapted daily wearer of soft contact lenses with at least 6 months of CL wear.
- Subject must agree to wear their contact lenses in both eyes on a daily wear schedule for at least 8 hours per day every day during the study.
- Subject must be willing and able to use only the care systems and lubricating drops provided for the study during the 4 week period.
- The subject must read, indicate understanding of and sign the Informed Consent Form.
-
The subject is a rigid gas permeable (RGP) or daily disposable lens wearer.
-
The presence of clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) anterior segment abnormalities; inflammations such as iritis; or any infection of the eye, lids or associated structures.
-
The presence of ocular or systemic disease or need for medication which might interfere with contact lens wear or which would cause the lenses to be removed more than twice a day. (i.e., Sjogren's syndrome, type II diabetes, etc.)
-
Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
- pathological dry eye or associated findings
- pterygium or corneal scars within the visual axis
- neovascularization equal to or greater than 1mm in from the limbus
- history of giant papillary conjunctivitis (GPC) worse than grade 2
- anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
- seborrhoeic eczema
- seborrhoeic conjunctivitis
-
A history of recurrent erosions, corneal infiltrates, corneal ulcer or fungal infections.
-
A known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity).
-
Contact lens snellen visual acuities (VA) worse than 20/30.
-
Aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
-
Current pregnancy or lactation (to the best of the subject's knowledge)
-
Any active participation in another clinical study at any time during this study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description comfilcon A/galyfilcon A galyfilcon A comfilcon A first, galyfilcon A second galyfilcon A/comfilcon A galyfilcon A galyfilcon A first, comfilcon A second galyfilcon A/comfilcon A comfilcon A galyfilcon A first, comfilcon A second comfilcon A/galyfilcon A comfilcon A comfilcon A first, galyfilcon A second
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lens Comfort 1-week, 2- weeks \>0 = comfortable, \<0 = uncomfortable; a weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes.
Comfort Symptoms 1-week, 2-weeks A weighted combined score calculated from individual comfort-related questions was used to derive comfort outcomes. \>0 = comfortable, \<0 = uncomfortable
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Overall Corneal Staining 2 weeks Measured for 5 zones of the cornea (superior, nasal, central, inferior, temporal)on a 0 to 3 grade scale (NEI 0-3 scale). Grade 0 = Normal/ grade 1 = mild, superficial stippling/ grade 2 = moderate, punctate staining including superficial abrasion of the cornea/ grade 3 = severe, abrasion or corneal erosion, deep corneal abrasion or recurrent erosion.