FDG-PET/CT in Evaluation of Cytological Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules to Prevent Unnecessary Surgery (EfFECTS)
- Conditions
- Thyroid NoduleThyroid Neoplasms
- Interventions
- Procedure: Diagnostic Thyroid SurgeryRadiation: FDG-PET/CTDevice: Ultrasound of the head and neck
- Registration Number
- NCT02208544
- Lead Sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of molecular imaging using FDG-PET/CT could prevent unnecessary diagnostic thyroid surgery in case of indeterminate cytology during fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
- Detailed Description
Rationale: Only about ¼ of patients with thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology are proven to suffer from a malignancy at diagnostic hemithyroidectomy. Therefore \~¾ is operated upon unbeneficially. Recent studies using FDG-PET/CT have suggested that it can decrease the fraction of unbeneficial procedures from \~73% to \~40%. Thereby the direct costs per patient, the number of hospitalization and average sick leave days might decrease and the experienced HRQoL might increase. A study will be undertaken to show the additional value of FDG-PET/CT after indeterminate cytology with respect to unbeneficial procedures, costs and utilities.
Main objective: To determine the impact of FDG-PET/CT on decreasing the fraction of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules undergoing unbeneficial patient management.
Study design: A prospective, multicentre, randomized, stratified controlled blinded trial with an experimental study-arm (FDG-PET/CT-driven) and a control study-arm (diagnostic hemithyroidectomy, independent of FDG-PET/CT-result).
Study population: Adult patients with a cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodule, without exclusion criteria, in 15 (university and regional) hospitals distributed over the Netherlands.
Intervention: One single FDG-PET/low-dose non-contrast enhanced CT of the head and neck is performed in all patients. Patient management depends on allocation and results of this FDG-PET/CT.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The number of unbeneficial interventions, i.e. surgery for benign disease or watchful-waiting for malignancy.
Secondary objectives: complication rate, consequences of incidental PET-findings, number of hospitalisation and sick leave days, volumes of healthcare consumed, experienced health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), genetic, cytological and (immuno)histopathological features of the nodules.
Sample size calculation/data analysis: Based on above-mentioned estimated reduction in unbeneficial interventions from \~73% to \~40%, at least 90 patients with nodules\>10 mm need to be analyzed (2:1 allocation, α=0.05, power=0.90, single-sided Fisher's exact test). After correction for nodule size and data-attrition, 132 patients need to be included in total. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. Incremental Net Monetary Benefit based on the total direct costs per patients and the gain in HRQoL-adjusted survival years are computed. Cytological, histological and genetic parameters for FDG-avidity will be described.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All patients undergo one FDG-PET/CT scan of head/neck (effective dose: \<3.5 mSv) and are asked to fill in 6 questionnaires at 4 timepoints. FDG-PET/CT negative patients in the experimental arm will undergo a single confirmatory US (±FNAC). An interim/posterior analysis of the control subjects is performed to ensure oncological safety. In case of an unexpected high false-negative ratio in this control arm, all patients will be advised to undergo surgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 132
- Documented history of a solitary thyroid nodule or a dominant nodule within multinodular disease, with (US-guided) FNAC performed by a dedicated radiologist or experienced endocrinologist or pathologist, demonstrating an indeterminate cytological examination (i.e. Bethesda category III or IV) according to the local pathologist and confirmed after central review;
- Scheduled for surgical excision (preferably) within 2 months of the inclusion date;
- Age ≥ 18 years;
- Euthyroid state with a serum thyrotropin (TSH) or a free T4 level within the institutional upper and lower limits of normal, measured within 2 months of registration. In case of a suppressed TSH: a negative 123I, 131I or 99mTcO4- scintigraphy must be available ("cold nodule");
- In patients with multinodular disease and a dominant nodule, the nuclear medicine physician responsible for FDG-PET/CT scan interpretation must determine whether the nodule is likely to be discriminated on FDG-PET/CT imaging prior to enrolment;
- Willing to participate in all aspects of the study;
-
High a priori probability of malignancy:
-
FNAC Bethesda category V or VI during local reading or central review;
-
Prior radiation exposure / radiotherapy to the thyroid;
-
Prior neck surgery or radiation that in the opinion of the PI has disrupted tissue architecture of the thyroid;
-
New unexplained hoarseness, change of voice, stridor or paralysis of a vocal cord;
- In case a benign reason has been found (e.g. vocal cord edema), the patient is eligible;
-
Thyroid nodule discovered as a FDG-PET positive incidentaloma
-
New cervical lymphadenopathy highly suspicious for malignancy;
- In case malignancy is excluded, patient is eligible;
-
Previous treatment for thyroid carcinoma or current diagnosis of any other malignancy that is known to metastasize to the thyroid;
-
Known metastases of thyroid carcinoma;
-
Known genetic predisposition for thyroid carcinoma:
- Familiar Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer (NMTC)
- Familiar Papillary Thyroid Cancer (FPTC)
- Familiar Adenomatoid Polyposis Coli syndrome (FAP, Gardner syndrome, APC-gene mutations on chromosome 5q21)
- Morbus Cowden (PTEN mutation on chromosome 10q23.3)
- PTC / nodular thyroid hyperplasia / papillary renal tumours. Linked to locus 1q21.
-
-
Proven benign disease or insufficient material for a cytological diagnosis:
- FNAC Bethesda category I or II during local reading or central review
-
Performance of non-routine additional diagnostic tests that alter the patients treatment policy (e.g. mutation analysis on cytology)
-
Inability to undergo randomization:
- Any patient that will receive thyroid surgery for other reasons (e.g. mechanical or cosmetic complaints).
-
Inability to undergo treatment:
- Inability to undergo surgery in the opinion of the surgeon / anaesthetist.
-
Contra-indications for FDG-PET/CT:
-
Patient has evidence of infection localized to the neck in the 14 days prior to the FDG-PET/CT scan;
-
Inability to tolerate lying supine for the duration of an FDG-PET/CT examination (~10-15min);
-
Poorly regulated diabetes mellitus (see next item);
-
Hyperglycaemia at time of FDG injection prior to PET/CT (fasting serum glucose >200mg/dL [>11.1 mmol/L]);
- The use of short-acting insulins within 4 hours of the PET scan is not allowed
-
If female and fertile: signs and symptoms of pregnancy or a positive pregnancy test / breast-feeding;
- A formal negative pregnancy test is not obligatory
-
(severe) claustrophobia;
- Low dose benzodiazepines are allowed
-
-
General contra-indications:
- Inability to give informed consent;
- Severe psychiatric disorder;
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Current Practice Diagnostic Thyroid Surgery diagnostic thyroid surgery despite results of FDG-PET/CT Current Practice FDG-PET/CT diagnostic thyroid surgery despite results of FDG-PET/CT FDG-PET/CT-driven FDG-PET/CT Following treatment based on FDG-PET/CT: * negative: watchful waiting including confirmatory ultrasound * positive: diagnostic thyroid surgery as planned FDG-PET/CT-driven Diagnostic Thyroid Surgery Following treatment based on FDG-PET/CT: * negative: watchful waiting including confirmatory ultrasound * positive: diagnostic thyroid surgery as planned FDG-PET/CT-driven Ultrasound of the head and neck Following treatment based on FDG-PET/CT: * negative: watchful waiting including confirmatory ultrasound * positive: diagnostic thyroid surgery as planned
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fraction of unbeneficial treatment 12 months after inclusion Unbeneficial treatment is defined as either:
* surgery in benign disease
* watchful waiting in malignant disease
benign or malignant disease is defined on final histology (after surgery) or 12 month follow-up including confirmatory neck ultrasonography.
This parameter is compared between both study arms based on intention-to-treat.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Lesion and Patient Characteristics 12 months after inclusion SO1d: To determine the influence of lesion size, pathological classification and patient characteristics on the diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT.
Fraction Incidental FDG-PET/CT Findings 12 months after inclusion SO1e: To determine whether incorporation of FDG-PET/CT of the head and neck lead to overdiagnosis in non-thyroidal incidental findings.
Fraction of Patients being operated despite negative FDG-PET/CT 12 months after inclusion SO1h: To determine the fraction of patients that cannot be reassured by a negative PET-scan (experimental arm only) despite careful selection of patients (implementability).
Fraction False-Negative FDG-PET/CT's 12 months after inclusion SO1c: To determine the false-negative fraction of FDG-PET/CT in this population.
incremental Net Monetary Benefit 12 months after inclusion SO3d: To determine the incremental Net Monetary Benefit of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT with respect to quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs, based on EQ-5D-5L index and overall survival) saved including sensitivity analysis.
SO3e: To determine the incremental Net Monetary Benefit of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT with respect to decrease in unbeneficial treatment.
Sensitivity analysis will be performed. A mere description will be given as there is no "accepted" value for this kind of analysis.Fraction Complications 12 months after inclusion SO1b: To determine the effect of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT on the complication-ratio.
HRQoL-scores according to SF36-II, EQ-5D-5L, SF-HLQ and ThyPRO including changes Baseline, 2 months, 6 months and 12 months after inclusion SO2a: To determine the impact on the experienced HRQoL between the group with and without FDG-PET/CT according to 4 different questionnaires at 4 timepoints during the first 12 months after FDG-PET/CT.
SO2b: To determine whether patients in the experimental arm with negative PET-findings have a different HRQoL than those who receive surgery independent of the FDG-PET/CT results.Direct Costs 12 months after inclusion SO3a: To determine the effect of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT on the mean direct costs (=volume of care multiplied by activity based costs) per patient during the first 12 months after FDG-PET/CT.
Overall and Disease Free Survival 12 months after inclusion SO1f: To determine the short-term overall and disease free survival in both study arms.
FDG-PET/CT Implementation-hampering Factors 12 months after inclusion SO1g: To determine which factors hamper implementation of this modality for this indication (structured interviews).
Number of Sick Leave Days 3 months after inclusions SO3c: To determine the total number of sick leave days for the first three months in the patients? Do these differ between both study arms?
Tissue Protein- and Gene-expression profile 12 months after inclusion of last patient SO4a: Are there potential protein- or gene-expression profiles, capable of determining the nature of the FNAC-indeterminate nodes (cytology) SO4b: What is the interaction/correlation between the parameters mentioned in SO4a and the results of the FDG-PET/CT scan and the final diagnosis?
Number of Hospitalisation Days 12 months after inclusion SO3b: To determine the effect of incorporation of FDG-PET/CT on the average length of hospital stay for treatment of (complications of) thyroid lesions?
Molecular biomarkers in relation to FDG-PET/CT 12 months after inclusion of last patient SO4b: What is the interaction/correlation between the parameters mentioned in SO4a and the results of the FDG-PET/CT scan and the final diagnosis?
* Can these tissue molecular biomarkers help in selecting the patients that benefit most from FDG-PET, or vice versa?
* Can higher pre-operative diagnostic accuracy be achieved by combining FDG-PET and molecular biomarkers?
* Are molecular biomarkers related to false-positive or false-negative FDG-PET/CT results?
Trial Locations
- Locations (15)
Radboudumc
🇳🇱Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
MUMC
🇳🇱Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands
VUmc
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
MeanderMC
🇳🇱Amersfoort, Utrecht, Netherlands
ErasmusMC
🇳🇱Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
Rijnstate
🇳🇱Arnhem, Netherlands
Reinier de Graaf Ziekenhuis
🇳🇱Delft, Netherlands
UMCG
🇳🇱Groningen, Netherlands
HagaZiekenhuis
🇳🇱The Hague, Netherlands
UMCU
🇳🇱Utrecht, Netherlands
Isala Klinieken
🇳🇱Zwolle, Netherlands
AMC
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
St. Antonius
🇳🇱Nieuwegein, Netherlands
LUMC
🇳🇱Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands