Comparison Between Ultra Sound Guided Rectus Sheath Block and Field Block for Midline Hernia Repair
- Conditions
- Pain, PostoperativeUltrasound Guided Rectus Sheath Block
- Interventions
- Drug: Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#5
- Registration Number
- NCT03225313
- Lead Sponsor
- Theodor Bilharz Research Institute
- Brief Summary
Randomized double blinded controlled clinical trial will be done with a total number of 75 patients will be divided into 3 groups. To compare between Ultra-sound guided rectus sheath block VS Field block infiltration in providing a good analgesia for patients undergoing midline hernia repair to detect which one is superior.
- Detailed Description
75 patients undergoing midline hernia repair under general anesthesia will be recruited and will be randomly allocated using closed envelope technique as follows: Control group, Local infilteration (Field block infilteration) group, Ultra sound Guided Rectus sheath block group.
General anesthesia will be standardized for all patients with :
2 µg kg-1 fentanyl and 2 mg kg-1 propofol. Neuromuscular blockade will be achieved with 0.5 mg kg-1 atracurium followed by tracheal intubation.
Muscle relaxation will be maintained by 0.1mg / kg / 30 minute of Atracrurium. Anesthesia will be maintained by sevoflurane. Mechanical ventilation will be adjusted with fresh gas flow oxygen in air 30-50% at a rate of 1 L min-1to maintain end-tidal carbon dioxide of 35-40 mm Hg and Spo2 greater than 94%.
BIS values will be maintained between 40 and 60. All surgical procedures will be done in the range between 10 am and 1 pm and by the same surgical team.
1. Control group : will receive field block using 0.3 ml/kg of normal saline at site of the hernia plus ultra- sound guided rectus sheath injection using 0.3 ml / kg of normal saline.
2. Field block group: will receive 0.3 ml / kg of 0.5% bupivicaine subcutaneously surrounding the site of the hernia following the induction of anesthesia and ultra-sound guided rectus sheath block with 0.3 ml / kg of normal saline.
3. Ultrasound guided rectus sheath block : Under sterile conditions a 21/22 G , 50- 100 milli meter length echogenic needle guided by the ultrasound into rectus sheath at the level of the umbilicus , using an - in plane technique. After -ve aspiration 0.3 ml/ kg of 0.5 % bupivicaine will be deposited on each side and the spread of local anesthesia will be observed by ultrasound plus 0.3 ml/kg of normal saline subcutaneously at the site of the hernia.
All solutions used will be prepared by a colleague who will not participate into the study.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 75
- Elective midline hernia repair surgery.
- Age: adult patients between 18 - 60 years old.
- Gender: Both male and female.
- ASA Class: I & II.
- Refusal of patient.
- Pregnancy and lactation.
- Fever or sepsis.
- Patients ASA III or IV.
- Addicts and drug abusers.
- Patients taking corticosteroids or any cardio - active drugs.
- Local infection at site of the injection.
- Allergy to any of the study medications.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Rectus block group Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.5% Injection Solution_#4 bupivicaine will be injected in the rectus sheath control group Normal Saline Flush, 0.9% Injectable Solution_#5 normal saline will be injected in the rectus sheath Field block group Bupivacaine Hydrochloride 0.5% Injection Solution_#4 bupivicaine will be injected locally in a circular fashion surrounding the site of the hernia
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Postoperative Pain at 2 Hours After Procedure. evaluation of postoperative pain in patients at 2 hours after procedure. Evaluation of the intensity of postoperative pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain: 0- 10 Scale; 0 the lowest pain score, 10 the highest pain scale.
0 score: Better pain control achieved. 10 score: Worst pain control achieved. 3 score: Controllable pain control achieved.Postoperative Pain at 6 Hours After Procedure. Evaluation of postoperative pain in patients at 6 hours after procedure. Evaluation of the intensity of postoperative pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain: 0- 10 Scale; 0 the lowest pain score, 10 the highest pain scale.
0 score: Better pain control achieved. 10 score: Worst pain control achieved. 3 score: Controllable pain control achieved.Immediate Postoperative Pain evaluation of postoperative pain in patients immediately after the procedure. Evaluation of the intensity of postoperative pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain: 0- 10 Scale; 0 the lowest pain score, 10 the highest pain scale.
0 score: Better pain control achieved. 10 score: Worst pain control achieved. 3 score: Controllable pain control achieved.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in the Level of Serum Cortisol. Measurement of serum cortisol level (nmol/ liter) using the ELISA technique after 1 hour of the start of the surgery. Measurement of serum cortisol level (nmol/ liter) using the ELISA technique after 1 hour of the start of the surgery.
Measurement of Serum Adrenaline Levels (ng/ml) Using ELISA Technique. 1 hour after the start of the surgery using ELISA technique. Measurement of serum adrenaline levels (ng/ml) 1 hour after the start of the surgery using ELISA technique.
Measurement of Serum Noradrenaline Levels (ng/ml) Using ELISA Technique. 30 minutes before the start of the surgery. Measurement of serum noradrenaline levels (ng/ml) using ELISA technique 30 minutes before the start of the surgery.
Measurement of Serum Cortisol Level (Nmol/ Liter) Using ELISA Technique. 30 minutes before the start of the surgery Measurement of serum cortisol level (nmol/ liter) using ELISA technique 30 minutes before the start of the surgery
Measurement of Serum Adrenaline Level (ng/ml) Using ELISA Technique. 30 minutes before the start of the surgery Measurement of serum adrenaline level (ng/ml) using ELISA technique 30 minutes before the start of the surgery.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Theodor Bilharz Research Institute
🇪🇬Giza, Egypt