MedPath

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Moderate-severe Skin Aging/Photoaging
Interventions
Dietary Supplement: Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov
Registration Number
NCT03274154
Lead Sponsor
Derming SRL
Brief Summary

Efficacy and Tolerance Evaluation of an Anti-age Food Supplement: a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study Versus Untreated Group

Detailed Description

Aim of the study was to evaluate the anti-age activity of "Pre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov" a food supplement, composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese), taken for 4 consecutive months by female subjects aged 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years), with moderate-severe skin aging/photoaging according to a reference photographic scale.

The study foresaw the evaluation of the study product activity versus a control group, untreated.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
66
Inclusion Criteria
  • female sex,
  • age 35-60 years (with preference for subjects over 45 years),
  • body mass index (BMI) 18-27,
  • caucasian healthy subjects with moderate-severe cutaneous aging/photoaging (score > 3 of the reference photographic scale in appendix 8),
  • agreeing to present at each study visit without make-up,
  • accepting to follow the instructions received by the investigator,
  • accepting to not change their habits regarding food, physical activity, make-up use, face cosmetic and cleansing products,
  • agreeing not to apply any topical or take any oral product or nutritional supplementation (vitamins and minerals) other than the investigational products, or use face massages or other means known to improve skin wrinkles or skin qualities during the entire duration of the study,
  • accepting not to expose their face to strong UV irradiation (UV session, or sun bathes), during the entire duration of the study,
  • no participation in a similar study actually or during the previous 3 months
  • accepting to sign the Informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy,
  • lactation,
  • subjects not in menopause who do not use adequate contraceptive precautions in order to avoid pregnancies during the study,
  • subjects not in menopause who do not accept to perform the pregnancy test at T0, T1, T2 and T3,
  • sensitivity to the test product or its ingredients (to be assessed by the investigator during the baseline visit);
  • subjects whose insufficient adhesion to the study protocol is foreseeable.

4.4.2. Dependent on a clinical condition 4.4.2.1. Dermatological disease,

  • Presence of cutaneous disease on the tested area as lesions, scars, malformations,
  • recurrent facial/labial herpes,
  • clinical and significant skin condition on the test area (e.g. active eczema, dermatitis, psoriasis etc.).
  • Endocrine disease,
  • hepatic disorder,
  • renal disorder,
  • cardiac disorder,
  • pulmonary disease,
  • cancer,
  • neurological or psychological disease,
  • inflammatory/immunosuppressive disease,
  • drug allergy.
  • Anti-inflammatory drugs, anti-histaminic, topic (application on the face) and systemic corticosteroids, narcotic, antidepressant, immunosuppressive drugs (with the except of hormonal treatment starting more than 1 year ago),
  • assumption of drugs or dietary supplements able to influence the test results in the investigator opinion.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pre-Hyaluron 465 InnēovPre-Hyaluron 465 Innēov43 caucasian female subjects have taken during a meal, for the first 4 months of trial,1 capsule and 1 tablet/die of the food supplement composed with a precursor of HA (glucosamine) and an enzymatic co-factor of HA synthesis (manganese) .
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Nasolabial folds visual score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales

Skin resistance to pinching clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important

1. = important

2. = moderate

3. = weak

4. = very weak

Skin radiance clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Skin radiance was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good

Skin plumpness clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Skin plumpness was evaluated using a 10 points scale from very poor to good

Surface microrelief regularity evaluationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Regularity grade was evaluated according to this score:

1. = very regular

2. = regular

3. = irregular

4. = very irregular

Vascular homogeneity clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score:

0 = very homogeneous

1. = homogeneous

2. = quite not homogeneous

3. = not homogeneous

4. = very not homogeneous

5. = marked not homogeneous

Crow's feet visual score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Wrinkles grade was determined according to l'Oreal clinical standardized photographic scales

Skin resistance to traction clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important

1. = important

2. = moderate

3. = weak

4. = very weak

Skin recovery after pinching clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

The evaluation was performed at level of cheek (malar region) according to the following score: 0 = very important

1. = important

2. = moderate

3. = weak

4. = very weak

Pigmentary homogeneity clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Homogeneity grade was determined according to specific reference clinical and photographic scales and to the following clinical score:

0 = very homogeneous

1. = homogeneous

2. = quite not homogeneous

3. = not homogeneous

4. = very not homogeneous

5. = marked not homogeneous

Skin dryness clinical score variationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Clinical evaluation of skin dryness was performed according to the following score:

0 = very hydrated skin

1. = hydrated skin

2. = normal skin

3. = kindly dry skin

4. = dry skin

5. = very dry skin

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Superficial skin hydrationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Skin electrical capacitance value measured with Corneometer CM825 (Courage - Khazaka, Köln, Germany).

The measure of the skin capacitance properties is an indirect expression of its hydration level.

Deep skin hydrationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Tissue dielectric constant value of superficial and deep skin layers measured with MoistureMeterD (Delfin Technologies, Kuopio - Finland)

Tolerance evaluationBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

The food supplement tolerance will be evaluated considering: any adverse event related to the study treatment, which occurred during the study; any judgement reported by the volunteers.

Determination of roughness profilometric parametersBasal visit (T0), 1 month (T1), 2 months (T2), 3 months (T3), 4 months (T4), 5 months (T5)

Nasolabial folds profilometric parameters measured by Primos compact portable device (GFMesstechnik). Ra is average roughness of the analysed profile, Rt is wrinkles total high, Rv is wrinkles maximum depth.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath