NCT05981443已完成不适用
Scar Analysis in Direct Excision Brow Lift: Comparing Octyl-2- Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
Cody Blanchard2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 8 人开始时间: 2023年8月15日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 8
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Number of Participants With Complications
研究概览
简要总结
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare Dermabond with non-absorbable sutures in skin closure after brow ptosis surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- if Dermabond provides equivalent wound healing compared to conventional non-absorbable skin suture techniques
- if Dermabond provides equivalent scar appearance compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques
- if Dermabond results in equivalent complication rates compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques Participants will have be randomly selected to have either Dermabond or non-absorbable suture closure methods. Scar analysis and both participant and provider surveys will be performed to assess the differences between groups, if any.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 100 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients undergoing bilateral direct excision brow lift for brow ptosis at the University of Kentucky Medical Center.
- •Patients > 18 years of age.
- •Patients must be able to follow up at the specified intervals.
- •Patients who are able to give their own informed consent.
- •Health Status: Variable health status reflective of general population of Kentucky. Patients will be healthy enough to be seen in an office setting.
- •All patients will need to be proficient in the English language to understand the scale used for scar assessment
排除标准
- •Patients <18 years of age or >100
- •Allergy to Dermabond
- •Adults with impaired consent capacity
- •Incarcerated individuals
结局指标
主要结局
Number of Participants With Complications
时间窗: 6 weeks
Complications of both Dermabond and non-absorbable sutures to include dehiscence and infection
Scar Appearance
时间窗: 6 weeks
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale filled out by both patient and provider at both postoperative visits of both Dermabond and non-absorbable sutures. This survey is scaled from 0-10, with 0 being normal skin and 10 being very different skin. Lower scores are desired on this survey.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Cody Blanchard
Resident Physician, Ophthalmology
University of Kentucky
研究点 (2)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Evaluation of Dermal Closure With an Absorbable Barbed Suture as Compared to a Conventional Absorbable SutureBreast PtosisObesityNCT00959374Medtronic - MITG229
Unknown
不适用
Split Scar Study to Assess Cosmetic Outcome From Differing Suture SpacingSuture, ComplicationWoundWound ComplicationWound DehiscenceWound of SkinSurgeryComplications, Infection or Inflammation SutureNCT03284983Silver Falls Dermatology30
已完成
不适用
Rapidly Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures for Mohs Surgery Repair on the Face: a Randomized Controlled Split-scar StudyScarsNCT01932359University of British Columbia105
终止
不适用
Staples Versus Suture for Cesarean Wound ClosureWoundNCT01008449University of Alabama at Birmingham398
已完成
不适用
Set-back Suture Versus Traditional Vertical Mattress SutureMelanomaSquamous Cell CarcinomaBasal Cell CarcinomaNCT01773447University of California, Davis47