MedPath

Dysphagia, QoL and Attitudes Towards PEG in ALS Patients

Recruiting
Conditions
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI)
Diagnostic Test: Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA)
Diagnostic Test: Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing
Diagnostic Test: Respiratory function measurements
Registration Number
NCT05336760
Lead Sponsor
University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
Brief Summary

In Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, dysphagia has a high incidence. With deterioration of swallowing function, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is recommended to ensure sufficient and safe oral intake. Dysphagia and PEG placement alter quality of life (QoL). However, QoL and attitudes toward PEG remain largely unexplored. The purpose of this study is to monitor the swallowing function in relationship to QoL and attitudes toward PEG tube insertion and feeding.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to monitor the deterioration of swallowing function in ALS patient population, and to explore its impact on QoL and attitudes toward PEG tube insertion and feeding in the course of the disease. It will take maximum of 60 minutes to fully evaluate the swallowing function and complete the questionnaires. The evaluation procedure will be repeated every 3 months until PEG tube insertion, which will allow us to closely monitor the swallowing function in a relation to attitudes toward PEG and QoL. The data obtained from this study should contribute significantly to the knowledge of QoL in ALS patients with dysphagia, and it will allow for a comparison of QoL in ALS patients with and without PEG tube. This study will also expand the understanding of attitudes in ALS patients and their relatives toward PEG, and the impact of those attitudes on the decision-making process.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ALS PatientsFiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of SwallowingPatients with confirmed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
ALS PatientsRespiratory function measurementsPatients with confirmed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
ALS PatientsIowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI)Patients with confirmed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
ALS PatientsMann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA)Patients with confirmed amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

IOPI is a device which measures tongue strength (in kilopascals; kPa) and endurance (in seconds) while the participant presses the bulb with the front or the base of their tongue to the hard palate.

Mann Assessment of Swallowing Ability (MASA) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

MASA is a standard clinical swallowing assessment protocol administered by the speech-language therapist. Total score ranges from 38-200. Lower score indicates higher impairment.

Questionnaire on Attitudes Toward PEG Tube Feeding and Insertion Procedure changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

The questionnaire comprises 10 questions. The participants specify their level of agreement on a five-point Likert-type scale (1=strongly disagree, 5= strongly agree).

Yale Residue Severity Rating Scale (YRSRS) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

YRSRS is a validated measure of swallowing efficiency using an image-based assessment to determine post-swallow pharyngeal residue: location and severity. It is assessed using a 5-point ordinal scale (from 1=0 % residue to 5=50 % residue).

Eating Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

EAT-10 is a validated self-administered dysphagia severity symptom survey including 10 items and a five-point scale (0=no problem to 4=sever problem). Higher total score indicates higher impairment.

Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QoL) changeAt baseline and every 3 months until PEG insertion, 3 and 6 months after PEG insertion

SWAL-QoL is a 44-item standardised psychometric scale that measures swallowing-related QoL across 10 domains. Scores for each individual domain and a total SWAL-QoL score are calculated. Total score ranges from 0-100 (100 indicating the most favourable state).

Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

PAS is an 8-point scale used to determine swallowing safety. Levels 1 and 2 are considered safe, levels \>3 indicate penetration or aspiration and are considered unsafe.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

FOIS is a validated 7-point scale demonstrating an individual's ability of daily oral food intake (1=no oral intake, 7=total oral intake with no restrictions).

Dysphagia Outcome and Severity Scale (DOSS) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

DOSS is a 7-point scale that rates the functional severity of dysphagia based on objective assessment and provides information on diet recommendations, independence level and type of nutrition necessary (level 7=normal swallowing function, level 1=severe dysphagia).

Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

Standard clinical respiratory assessment of MIP (in cmH2)

ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

ALSFRS-R is a 12-tem ALS-specific assessment of global functioning using a five-point scale (0=not able, 4= normal ability), with 48 points representing normal function.

BMI changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

Body mass index (in kg/m\^2)

Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

Standard clinical respiratory assessment of FVC (in %)

Peak Cough Flow (PCF) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

Standard clinical respiratory assessment of PCF (in L/min)

Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP) changeDifference between baseline and PEG insertion (usually in 6-25 months after diagnosis, maximum follow-up 30 months)

Standard clinical respiratory assessment of MEP (in cmH2)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Medical Centre Ljubljana

🇸🇮

Ljubljana, Slovenia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath