Comparison of the Efficacy of Sterile Gauze and Semi-permeable Film Dressing for Hemodialysis Non-tunneling Central Venous Catheter
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Enrollment
- 154
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- exit-site infection
Study Overview
Brief Summary
This prospective single center RCT aims to compare sterile gauze and tape versus Semi-permeable film dressing on the incidence of exit-site infection, CRBSIs (catheter-related bloodstream infections), skin irritation, total bacterial count, dressing intactness and cost-benefit, nursing workload in hemodialysis patients with a non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter.
Detailed Description
This prospective single center RCT aims to compare sterile gauze and tape versus Semi-permeable film dressing on the incidence of exit-site infection, CRBSIs (catheter-related bloodstream infections), skin irritation, total bacterial count, dressing intactness and cost-benefit, nursing workload in hemodialysis patients with a non-tunneled hemodialysis catheter.
154 eligible patients in our HD center will be enrolled consecutively and randomly allocated to one of the two groups according to computer-generated randomization sequences in a 1:1 ratio. Experiment group use semi-permeable film as dressing in exit-site of CVC, and a sterile gauze and tape in control group. Both groups share same disinfection and dressing change procedure. Dressings will be replaced per hemodialysis session, or as needed. Socio-demographic data and disease-related information will be collected, as well as catheterization site, physician, skin and exit status of the catheterization site at baseline. Data as listed in the beginning will be recorded in the next 2 weeks follow-up at every session, such as sign of exit-site infection, CRBSIs (catheter-related bloodstream infections), skin irritation and dryness, dressing intactness. Before the 2nd dressing change, skin around exit of CVC under dressing area will be swabbed by a cotton swab. Nursing time of dressing change will be recorded by a third nurses. Cost and benefit will be calculated and compared by the end.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Prevention
- Masking
- None
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •age more than 18 years; requiring hemodialysis treatment by non-tunneled CVC inserted through subclavian vein, femoral vein, internal jugular vein by nephrologists team, allowing sufficient blood flow; competent to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
- •current systemic antibiotic therapy as a result of bacteremia in the previous 21 days; pregnancy; with a known dermatitis at the exit site or known hypersensitivity to a component of either dressing; require antibiotic lock or antibiotic ointment in exit-site for infection prevention locally
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
exit-site infection
Time Frame: before disinfectant and dressing change at every hemodialysis session within 2 weeks
redness, tenderness, swelling and/or with exudation within 2 cm around exit of CVC in the skin
Secondary Outcomes
- catheter-related blood stream infection(CRBSI)(within 2-week follow-up or before withdrawn of hemodialysis therapy if the patient cannot reach 2 weeks)
- skin erythema and dryness under the dressing area(before disinfectant and dressing change at every hemodialysis session within 2 weeks)
- dressing intactness(before disinfectant and dressing change at every hemodialysis session within 2 weeks)
- total bacterial count(Once only. At the time of the 2nd dressing change after CVC insertion of each patient(dressing change usually happened at each hemodialysis therapy session))
- nursing time for dressing change(at any of the session, once only)
Investigators
Liang Junqing
nurse
Peking University People's Hospital