MedPath

A Randomised Trial Comparing Supraclavicular Block vs Supraclavicular and Pecs II Block in Arteriovenous Grafting

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Arteriovenous Graft
Arteriovenous Fistula
Kidney Failure, Chronic
Renal Failure, End-stage
Interventions
Procedure: Supraclavicular
Procedure: Pecs II block
Procedure: Sham block (Grade 1)
Registration Number
NCT02331030
Lead Sponsor
Changi General Hospital
Brief Summary

This study evaluates the addition of Pecs II block to ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block in patients undergoing arteriovenous graft creation surgery. Participants will be randomised into two equal groups, one receiving supraclavicular and pecs II blocks, the other receiving supraclavicular block and sham block (Grade 1).

Detailed Description

Regional anaesthesia (RA) for arteriovenous grafting surgery has advantages of avoiding risks of general anaesthesia (GA) in this group of patients with significant co-morbidities, and beneficial vasodilatation, which may prevent early fistula thrombosis. Hence, RA is preferable to GA for this surgery.

Brachial plexus blocks (BPB) are the most commonly employed RA technique to anaesthetise the upper limb for this surgery. According to the results of a recent 2-year retrospective audit in our centre, ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB are the most popular RA technique for this surgery. Anatomically, the T1 and T2 dermatomes are often missed by the supraclavicular BPB. This means that the upper medial arm and axilla (sites involved in brachiobasilic and brachioaxillary arteriovenous grafting) may not be adequately anaesthetised, mandating intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation by the surgeon. This may affect patients' and surgeons' acceptance of, and satisfaction with the RA technique. The ultrasound-guided Pecs II block, described by Blanco et al, seems to address this problem, as the intercostal T1-6, intercostobrachialis, long thoracic nerves and nerve to serratus anterior are targeted by this block.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
36
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients scheduled for arteriovenous grafting under regional anaesthesia in Changi General Hospital
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 3 to 4
  • Elective or emergency surgery
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients unable to give consent, unable to communicate or cooperate with simple instructions
  • Patients with regular consumption of strong opioids (eg. morphine, oxycodone) or steroids
  • Patients with allergy or contraindications to local anaesthetics or any of the drugs included in this study
  • Patients with pre-existing upper limb neurological deficits
  • Patients who refuse or are unsuitable for regional anaesthesia (eg. severely coagulopathic)

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Combined (C)Ropivacaine 0.5% 20mlUltrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and Pecs II block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 10ml.
Combined (C)Ropivacaine 0.5% 10mlUltrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and Pecs II block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 10ml.
Combined (C)Pecs II blockUltrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and Pecs II block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 10ml.
Combined (C)SupraclavicularUltrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and Pecs II block with Ropivacaine 0.5% 10ml.
Supraclavicular (S)Sham block (Grade 1)Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and sham block (grade 1)
Supraclavicular (S)SupraclavicularUltrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and sham block (grade 1)
Supraclavicular (S)Ropivacaine 0.5% 20mlUltrasound-guided supraclavicular BPB with Ropivacaine 0.5% 20ml and sham block (grade 1)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Need for intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation by the surgeonIntraoperative

Whether there was a need for the surgeon to infiltrate a standardised local anaesthetic drug (0.5% ropivacaine) to the operative site during surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Volume of intraoperative local anaesthetic supplementation administeredIntraoperative

Total volume of local anaesthetic drug (0.5% ropivacaine) given by the surgeon

Need for additional sedation or systemic analgesiaIntraoperative

Whether there was a need for additional sedation or systemic analgesia (on top of what is specified in the protocol)

Highest pain score at Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU)Up to 1 hour post-operatively

Highest pain score on visual analogue scale at the post-anaesthesia care unit

Time to first post-operative analgesiaUp to 24 hours post-operatively

Duration of time from administration of the block(s) to when patient first requests for oral analgesia. Participants will be followed up for 24 hours after surgery.

Pain score at 12h12 hours post-operatively

Pain score on visual analogue scale 12 hours after surgery

Pain score at 24h24 hours post-operatively

Pain score on visual analogue scale 24 hours after surgery

Patient satisfaction at 24hours24 hours post-operatively

Patient satisfaction with the anaesthesia technique on a 5-point Likert scale 24 hours after surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Changi General Hospital

🇸🇬

Singapore, Singapore

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath