Cost Effectiveness of Language Services in Hospital Emergency Departments
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Language Discordance
- Sponsor
- Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
- Enrollment
- 447
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Cost-effectiveness of in-person interpreters versus other language services
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 10 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Numerous studies suggest that the use of in-person, professionally trained medical interpreters can reduce health care costs associated with diagnosing and treating patients with limited English proficiency. However, few studies have specifically addressed the question of the cost-effectiveness of language services in health care settings. This study used a randomized controlled study design to compare the cost-effectiveness of using professional interpreters with Spanish-speaking patients seen in hospital emergency departments (EDs) versus using the usual language services available to these patients. The main goal of the study was to estimate the effect that professional interpreters have on resource utilization and patient/provider satisfaction in the ED compared to the language services usually offered in these settings. Our hypothesis was that use of trained interpreters would lead to more cost-effective provision of ED services.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •limited English proficient (LEP) Spanish-speaking patients
- •adults aged 18 or older
- •LEP parents of children seen in emergency departments
Exclusion Criteria
- •cognitively impaired, comatose, or traumatized patients
- •healthy volunteers
- •prisoners
- •hospital employees
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Cost-effectiveness of in-person interpreters versus other language services
Time Frame: June 2009
Secondary Outcomes
- Satisfaction with ability to communicate(June 2009)