Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05219032
NCT05219032
Terminated
Not Applicable

Interpreters as Advocates for Hispanic Patients With Hypertension

Case Western Reserve University0 sites38 target enrollmentApril 2010
ConditionsHypertension

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Hypertension
Sponsor
Case Western Reserve University
Enrollment
38
Primary Endpoint
Patient reported satisfaction with the clinical encounter with their clinician
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
4 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if medical interpreters trained to advocate on behalf of their patients deliver improved care compared to standard medical interpreters

Detailed Description

Over 21 million Americans have limited English proficiency. About two-thirds of these individuals speak Spanish. Limited English proficiency has major adverse impacts on health and health care. Using trained medical interpreters may help overcome this language barrier. Compared to patients who need but don't get an interpreter, patients who use trained medical interpreters have better satisfaction, quality of care, and health outcomes. However, the outcomes of patients using interpreters is often poorer than that of English-speaking patients. This randomized controlled trial will test the utility of using interpreters as advocates for Spanish-speaking inner city patients with hypertension.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2010
End Date
January 2014
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Daryl Thornton

Associate Professor

Case Western Reserve University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Spanish speaking
  • Limited English proficiency
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Regular visit with primary care provider who is not proficient in Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patient reported satisfaction with the clinical encounter with their clinician

Time Frame: 6 months

Patients will rate their satisfaction with the clinical encounter with their clinician y responding to several questions about the encounter using a 5-point Likert scale.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Provider reported satisfaction with the clinical encounter with the patient(6 months)
  • Change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure(6 months)

Similar Trials