Comparative Study of Physiological Uptake of FDG-PET in Colon and Colonoscopy for Colorectal Lesion Detectio
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Colorectal cancer
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000047555
- Lead Sponsor
- niversity of Miyazaki
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 184
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
Cases in which abnormal accumulation was pointed out by FDG-PET
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Detection rate of colorectal cancer
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Detection rate of adenomatous polyps
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
How does FDG-PET physiological uptake in the colon detect metabolic pathways in colorectal neoplasms compared to colonoscopy?
What is the detection rate of FDG-PET physiological uptake in the colon versus colonoscopy for colorectal lesions in the JPRN-UMIN000047555 trial?
Which predictive biomarkers correlate with FDG-PET physiological uptake in colorectal lesions for detection accuracy?
What adverse events are associated with FDG-PET colon imaging versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening?
How do alternative PET tracers or imaging techniques compare to FDG-PET in detecting colorectal lesions in observational studies?