MedPath

Effect of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation in Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Fibromyalgia
Interventions
Procedure: transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS)
Procedure: Sham transcranial static magnetic field stimulation
Registration Number
NCT04836325
Lead Sponsor
University of Seville
Brief Summary

The main objective is to know if the transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) reduces the perception of pain in patients with fibromyalgia and its effect on health-related quality of life. In addition, it will seek to limit the parameters necessary to achieve efficiency with the technique.

Detailed Description

Background:

Various non-invasive brain stimulation techniques have been successfully tested in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) is a new, portable and inexpensive non invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technique that has shown security, biological effects, and therapeutical effects in some pathologies. Some studies have studied its effect in pain central processing, our aim is to study its effect on FMS. The safety that tSMS has demonstrated in several clinical trials opens doors to future clinical trials that will extend its clinical utility.

Objectives:

To investigate the effect of tSMS on pain in patients with FMS, using subjective and objective assessment measures. Identify dose response to the treatment to limit the parameters required to achieve effectiveness with the technique.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
16
Inclusion Criteria
  • Formal diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS).
  • No change in the last 4 weeks on their standard treatment.
  • They must have pain for more than 6 months (at least 4 on the VAS scale).
  • Score on the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ) greater than 39.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Presence of concomitant autoimmune or hematologic diseases.
  • Neuropsychiatric disorders.
  • Pacemakers or neurostimulators implants.
  • Substance abuse or other pathologies that can explain chronic pain.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Those who are receiving any other type of physiotherapy treatment.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Experimental: transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS)transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS)The intervention group will receive a treatment of Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation (tSMS) in the primary motor cortex with a duration of 30 minutes, 5 times a week, during 4 weeks, for a total of 20 sessions.
Sham transcranial static magnetic field stimulationSham transcranial static magnetic field stimulationThe placebo group will receive a dummy treatment with a duration of 30 minutes, 5 times a week, during 4 weeks, for a total of 20 sessions.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Self-reported pain intensityAt the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Self-reported pain intensity evaluated by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Change from Self-reported quality of lifeAt the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Self-reported quality of life evaluated by the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change from Global healthAt the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Self-reported Global health evaluated by the Short form-36 (SF-36).

Change from Cognitive impairmentAt the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Cognitive impairment evaluated by the Multidimensional Inventory of Subjective Cognitive Impairment.

Change from Confidence in the treatmentAfter the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Confidence in the treatment evaluated by the Patient Global Impression of Change.

Change from Physical activityAfter the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Change from Physical activity evaluated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Change from DepressionAt the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Depression Evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: 14 items, 7 for depression and 7 for anxiety. Each item had been answered by the patient on a four-point (0-3) response category so the possible scores ranged from 0 to 21 for anxiety and 0 to 21 for depression, the worse the result the higher the score.

Change from Self-reported catastrophizingAt the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Self-reported catastrophizing evaluated by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: 13 items, using the 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale. A total score is yielded (ranging from 0-52), the worse the result the higher the score.

Change from SleepAt the start of the study (at baseline, 0 week), after the 10th session (at the end of the second week), after 20th session (at the end of the fourth week), 1 month from the last session (8th week)) and 3 months from the last session (16th week)

Change from Sleep evaluated by the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale:12 Likert-type items with 6 degrees of response (from 1-always to 6-never). For its interpretation, a gross estimate of the amount of sleep is obtained (item 2) and scores in the different subscales. The direct scores are transformed into a scale from 0 to 100, with no cut-off points; the higher the score, the greater the intensity of the concept evaluated.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Grupo de Investigación Área de Fisioterapia CTS 305 - Universidad de Sevilla

🇪🇸

Sevilla, Spain

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath