MedPath

Prospective, multicenter, comparative study of recurrence-free survival after liver transplantation in two tumor stage-defined groups (UNOS T2 versus Milan-out / UCSF-in) of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis and locoregional therapy for bridging the waiting period

Not Applicable
Conditions
C22.0
Liver cell carcinoma
Registration Number
DRKS00014582
Lead Sponsor
niversitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Campus Kiel
Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Recruiting stopped after recruiting started
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
14
Inclusion Criteria

Patients with HCC in cirrhosis according to current guidelines
- Patients with HCC in cirrhosis in the tumor stage UNOS T2 or patients with HCC in cirrhosis outside Milan and within the UCSF criteria
- Age from 18 years
- Decision of the transplant conference with approval for liver transplantation
- Decision of the tumor conference with diagnosis and tumor stage
- Listing at Eurotransplant

Exclusion Criteria

- Patients with extrahepatic HCC manifestation (N + M +)
- patients with macrovascular invasion of HCC (V2)
- Existing pregnancy

Study & Design

Study Type
interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Recurrence-free patient survival 2 years after liver transplantation is compared in both study arms.
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
1) Patient survival 2 years after liver transplantation will be compared between both study arms.<br>2) Patient survival and tumor-free patient survival after initial diagnosis of HCC will be compared in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis within the 2-year follow-up period after liver transplantation between both arms.<br>3) Tumor-specific drop-out rate (TSDOR) will be compared between both study arms.<br>4) Response to bridging therapy will be compared between both study arms.<br>5) Patient survival and tumor-free patient survival after 2 years after liver transplantation will be analyzed and compared in consideration of<br>(a) histopathological grading,<br>(b) microvascular (as well as macrovascular) invasion and<br>(c) the tumor marker AFP <br>between both study arms.
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath