MedPath

Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Impression Techniques Used for Maxillary Hybrid Prosthesis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Prosthesis Durability
Interventions
Other: impression techniques for implant used for maxillary screw retained hybrid prosthesis
Registration Number
NCT05321589
Lead Sponsor
Mansoura University
Brief Summary

evaluation and comparison of the accuracy of conventional and digital impression for full arch screw retained prosthesis for edentulous maxilla.

Detailed Description

Each patient received 6 implants in the maxillary ridge (widely distributed across the arch) in the following positions: central incisors, canines/first premolar teeth and first molar teeth aided by surgical stent. then each patient received 2 types of impression techniques Technique 1 :conventional impression conventional open tray impression technique with splinted transfers using vinylpolysiloxane and Technique2 : Digital impression taken using original scan bodies torqued to the implants .three dimensional accuracy of impression techniques was evaluated using linear measurements and 3D deviation between the two techniques was measured.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
12
Inclusion Criteria
  • The patients were selected according to the following inclusion criteria:

    1. Completely edentulous maxillary and mandibular ridges
    2. Healthy ridge covered by normal oral mucosa and free from any ridge flabbiness.
    3. All of the patients were dissatisfied with the retention and stability of their maxillary conventional dentures and expressed a strong desire for a more stable prosthesis.
    4. Sufficient bone quantity and quality in the front and posterior maxillary regions, as determined by preoperative CBCT, to accommodate six implants with a diameter of at least 3.5 mm and a length of at least 10 mm.
    5. Enough restorative space (from the mucosa covering the crest of the maxillary residual ridge to the occlusal plane) to allow the fixed prosthesis to be constructed ,preliminary jaw relationship revealed this.
    6. It's been at least a year since the last extraction.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
<!-- -->
  1. Systemic diseases that may alter tissue response to implantation and affects osseointegration (radiation, diabetes, osteoporosis, bleeding disorders or hepatic patients)
  2. Long term immunosuppressive and corticosteroid drug therapy.
  3. Patient with abnormal habits as clenching and bruxism.
  4. Smoking patients.
  5. Patients with problems in TMJ.
  6. Neuromuscular diseases.
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
technique 1: conventional splinted open tray impressionimpression techniques for implant used for maxillary screw retained hybrid prosthesisa conventional open tray impression technique splinted with ligature wire and duralay resin was done with polyvinyl siloxane impression . analogues were screwed to the impression copings and casts were poured.
technique 2: digital intraoral impression techniqueimpression techniques for implant used for maxillary screw retained hybrid prosthesisscan bodies were screwed to implants intraorally and digital scanner was used to record digital impression, scanning protocol started from occlusal ,buccal to palatal surfaces. The resulting scans were then exported in the standard tessellation format (.STL)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
accuracy of impression techniqueimmediately after the intervention/procedure

deviation measurements digitally

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
passivity of final restorationimmediately after the intervention/procedure

Clinical measurement of prosthesis passivity using single screw test of Sheffield.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

faculty of Dentistry , Mansoura University

🇪🇬

Mansoura, DK, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath