Adhesive Performance of Glass Ionomer Versus Resin Based Adhesive Systems
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Percentage % of patients with marginal staining
研究概览
简要总结
This study aimed to clinically evaluate the 3-years clinical performance of glass ionomer and resin based adhesive systems in Class V restorations.
详细描述
The formulated null hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the clinical performances between glass ionomer and resin based adhesive systems in Class V restorations for 3-years.
The research question was as follows: Do glass ionomer adhesives in class V restorations present better clinical performances than resin based adhesive systems according to the modified United States Public Health Service (modified-USPHS) criteria?
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 35 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Patients with primary caries involving cervical surface only with ICDAS 2 and
- •Patients with normal and full occlusion.
- •Patients with tooth gives positive response to testing with an electric pulp tester.
- •Patients must have a good oral hygiene.
- •Patients with opposing teeth should be natural with no restorations.
排除标准
- •High caries risk patients with extremely poor oral hygiene.
- •Patients involved in orthodontic treatment or periodontal surgery.
- •Patients with periodontally involved teeth (chronic periodontitis).
- •Patients with heavy bruxism habits and clenching.
- •Patients with abutments should be excluded.
结局指标
主要结局
Percentage % of patients with marginal staining
时间窗: 3 years after restoration procedure
Percentage of marginal staining in patients was clinically assessed using USPHS criteria. Restorations were given the score Alpha for the ideal clinical situation, Bravo for clinically acceptable and Charlie for clinically unacceptable and in need for replacement.
次要结局
未报告次要终点