Taste and Palatability of Orfadin Suspension
- Registration Number
- NCT01734889
- Lead Sponsor
- Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to verify that pediatric patients, especially those who are not old enough to swallow capsules, accept the taste and palatability of a new suspension.
- Detailed Description
This is an open, non-randomized, non-controlled, multiple-dose study in 18 pediatric patients. The treatment period is three days, and during the study the subjects will rate the taste and palatability of the suspension or (for younger children) their parents will rate the child´s acceptance of the suspension.
The study consists of a screening period, a 3 day treatment period and a 1 week follow-up period.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 18
- Patients with HT-1 currently managed on Orfadin (nitisinone) capsules.
- Age from 1 month to less than 18 years.
- Signed informed consent.
- Any medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator makes the subject unsuitable for inclusion.
- Enrollment in another concurrent clinical study, or intake of an investigational medicinal product (IMP), within one month prior to inclusion in this study.
- Foreseeable inability to cooperate with given instructions or study procedures.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Orfadin suspension Nitisinone Drug: nitisinone, oral suspension
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Taste Score for the Last Dose of the Suspension on Day 3 for Subjects 5 - <18 Years Day 3 Patients rated the taste of the suspension. The following grading was applied: 5 (very good taste), 4 (good taste), 3 (neither good nor bad taste), 2 (bad taste) and 1 (very bad taste).
The Acceptability Score for the Last Dose of the Suspension on Day 3 for Subjects < 5 Years Day 3 The parents of patients aged \<5 years rated their child´s acceptability of the suspension. The following grading was applied: 5 (very well), 4 (well), 3 (neither well nor badly), 2 (badly) and 1 (very badly).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Palatability Scores on Day 1 (Subjects 5 - < 18 Years) Day 1 Patients rated the palatability of the suspension. The following grading was applied: 5 (very good), 4 (good), 3 (neither good nor bad), 2 (bad) and 1 (very bad).
The Palatability Scores on Day 2 (Subjects 5 - < 18 Years) Day 2 Patients rated the palatability of the suspension. The following grading was applied: 5 (very good), 4 (good), 3 (neither good nor bad), 2 (bad) and 1 (very bad).
The Palatability Scores on Day 3 (Subjects 5 - < 18 Years) Day 3 Patients rated the palatability of the suspension. The following grading was applied: 5 (very good), 4 (good), 3 (neither good nor bad), 2 (bad) and 1 (very bad).
Trial Locations
- Locations (7)
Klinikum der Universität München
🇩🇪München, Germany
Hopital Necker
🇫🇷Paris, France
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
🇩🇪Düsseldorf, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
🇩🇪Heidelberg, Germany
Birmingham Children's Hospital
🇬🇧Birmingham, United Kingdom
Evelina Children's Hospital, St Thomas' Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
St Mary's Hospital
🇬🇧Manchester, United Kingdom