跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05773872
NCT05773872招募中不适用

Evaluation of Social Cognition in Patient With Type 1 or Type 2 Narcolepsy Versus Patients With Idiopathic Hypersomnia

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 75 人开始时间: 2022年11月18日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
75
试验地点
2
主要终点
Mean SART score in the three groups

研究概览

简要总结

Narcolepsy is a chronic disabling neurologic disorder mainly characterised by excessive daytime sleepiness. Type 1 narcolepsy is associated with a deficit of hypocretin in the cerebrospinal fluid responsible for the cataplexy symptom while type 2 shows a normal hypocretin level and no cataplexy. While the development of narcolepsy is independent of parental social level, narcolepsy has a significant influence on educational level, grading, social outcome, and welfare consequences. Several studies assessed global cognition efficiency, mood, and attention in narcoleptic patients but only a few specifically measured social cognition and mostly without a control group.

In a population of narcoleptics children, a severe impairment in social cognition is described for 20% of the group, contrary to 2 % for the control group. The literature also depicts some impairments in decision making, somatic and cognitive emotions responses but the emotion recognition seems to be preserved.

A better understanding of the social and cognitive aspects of narcolepsy could lead to a better treatment of the disease in its entirety, including if relevant specific cognitive behavioural therapy.

The protocol consists in a psychometric evaluation including several questionnaires in order to assess social cognition. It will be proposed to patients with type 1 or type 2 narcolepsy and patients with idiopathic hypersomnia.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Screening
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • adult patients (>/= 18years old)
  • diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia
  • non opposition

排除标准

  • comorbid psychiatric or neurologic disease
  • patient under 18 years old
  • patient under guardianship, curators or deprived of liberty, refusal of the patient

研究组 & 干预措施

HSI

Active Comparator

idiopathic hypersomnia

干预措施: Questionary (Other)

NT1

Experimental

type 1 narcolepsy

干预措施: Questionary (Other)

NT2

Experimental

type 2 narcolepsy

干预措施: Questionary (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Mean SART score in the three groups

时间窗: 2 years

SART is Sustained Attention to Response Task. The Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) is a computer-based go/no-go task that requires participants to withhold behavioral response to a single, infrequent target (often the digit 3) presented amongst a background of frequent non-targets (0-2, 4-9). There is evidence supporting the role of the SART as a measure of working memory, sustained attention, and impulse/inhibitory control.

Mean IGT score in the three groups

时间窗: 2 years

The Iowa gambling task (IGT) is a psychological task thought to simulate real-life decision making. Participants are presented with four virtual decks of cards on a computer screen. They are told that each deck holds cards that will either reward or penalize them, using game money. The goal of the game is to win as much money as possible. Net scores are calculated as follow: \[advantageous decks (C + D) minus disadvantageous decks (A + B)\] for five blocks of 20 selections.

Mean UPPS score in the three groups

时间窗: 2 years

UPPS (Impulsive Behaviour Scale). The Impulsive behavior scale (S-UPPS-P) is an instrument composed of 20 items rated on a four-point Likert scale (23): (1) disagree strongly, (2) disagree some, (3) agree some, and (4) agree strongly. Scores are presented for each of five subscales, plus a total impulsivity score. In addition to the raw scores, in order to put each subscale into the same metric, the mean is calculated for the items on each subscale, from 1 to 4, where 1 indicates that the respondent did not indorse impulsive answers, and 4 indicating a high level of self-reported impulsivity.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验