Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT07576803
NCT07576803Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Ultrasound-Guided Hydrodissection Combined With Neuroprolotherapy Versus Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Non-Inferiority Trial

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco1 site in 1 country72 target enrollmentStarted: May 2, 2026Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
72
Locations
1

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial designed to compare ultrasound-guided hydrodissection combined with neuroprolotherapy versus open carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated sequence, with allocation concealment ensured by sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed by blinded evaluators.

The experimental group will undergo a single session of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection with perineural injection of a solution composed of zero point nine percent sodium chloride and five percent dextrose, combined with local anesthetic and betamethasone, aiming to promote mechanical release of the median nerve and modulation of the inflammatory process. The control group will undergo standard open carpal tunnel release through surgical division of the transverse carpal ligament under sterile conditions.

Participants will be assessed at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after intervention. The primary outcome is the change in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score at 3 months. A non-inferiority margin of 0.5 points will be adopted. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity measured by visual analog scale, grip strength, pinch strength, median nerve cross-sectional area assessed by ultrasound, time to return to work, and procedure-related complications.

Statistical analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with complementary per-protocol analysis. Between-group comparisons will be conducted using analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values, and repeated measures will be analyzed using mixed-effects models. The hypothesis is that the minimally invasive intervention is non-inferior to surgical decompression, with potential advantages in recovery and morbidity.

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial designed to compare ultrasound-guided hydrodissection combined with neuroprolotherapy versus open carpal tunnel release in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. The study will be conducted at a tertiary referral center. Eligible participants will be adults with a clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome who meet predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the experimental or control group using a computer-generated randomization sequence. Allocation concealment will be ensured through the use of sequentially numbered, sealed, opaque envelopes prepared by an independent researcher. Outcome assessment and statistical analysis will be performed by blinded evaluators to minimize detection bias.

The experimental group will undergo a single session of ultrasound-guided hydrodissection combined with neuroprolotherapy. The procedure will be performed under sterile conditions with real-time ultrasound guidance. A needle will be positioned adjacent to the median nerve at the level of the carpal tunnel, followed by perineural injection of a solution composed of zero point nine percent sodium chloride and five percent dextrose, combined with local anesthetic and betamethasone, with a total volume of approximately ten milliliters. The objective of the intervention is to achieve mechanical separation of the median nerve from surrounding structures and to promote modulation of the local inflammatory environment. The procedure duration is expected to be approximately fifteen to twenty minutes. Post-procedure care will include the use of simple analgesics and guidance for gradual return to daily activities.

The control group will undergo open carpal tunnel release, performed in an operating room under sterile conditions. The procedure will be conducted using local or regional anesthesia and involves a longitudinal palmar incision, identification and division of the transverse carpal ligament to decompress the median nerve, followed by hemostasis, layered closure, and application of a compressive dressing. The procedure duration is expected to be approximately twenty to thirty minutes. Standardized postoperative care will include analgesia, wound care, early finger mobilization, and suture removal between ten and fourteen days.

Participants in both groups will be evaluated at baseline, and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the intervention. The primary outcome is the change in the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire score at 3 months. A non-inferiority margin of 0.5 points will be used to determine whether the experimental intervention is not clinically worse than surgical treatment.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Outcome assessors and the statistician will be blinded to group allocation. Participants and treating surgeons cannot be blinded due to the nature of the interventions.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or olde
  • Clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Presence of symptoms for at least 3 months
  • Failure of conservative treatment, including splinting, medication, or physical therapy
  • Ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous carpal tunnel surgery in the affected limb
  • Severe thenar muscle atrophy
  • Cervical radiculopathy or proximal nerve compression
  • Pregnancy
  • Coagulopathy or current use of anticoagulants contraindicating procedures
  • Local infection at the intervention site
  • Inability to comply with follow-up

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Giselly Veríssimo De Miranda

MD

Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Hydrodissection With Neuroprolotherapy... | Clinical Trial