Factors Associated With Parental Observation of Side Effects Following the Child Flu Vaccine
- Conditions
- Influenza Vaccine, Influenza
- Interventions
- Other: No intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT02909855
- Lead Sponsor
- King's College London
- Brief Summary
This study investigates whether there are psychological predictors of parental perception of side-effects following vaccination with the child flu vaccine. We will also investigate whether the perception of side-effects affects parents' intention to vaccinate their child again in the following flu season, as well as whether there are underlying differences in parents' cognitive biases between those who do and do not re-vaccinate their child.
- Detailed Description
In 2012, the British Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) recommended that the influenza vaccination programme be extended to include children aged 2 to 16. In the three flu seasons in which the child flu immunisation programme has been running (2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16), uptake rates have been low (approximately 40%). Multiple factors are likely to underlie the poor uptake, including thinking the vaccine was unsafe and ineffective and having experienced side-effects related to the vaccine previously.
Although symptoms are commonly reported following vaccinations, their causes are not always straightforward. Although a minority may be directly attributable to the vaccine itself, others may reflect pre-existing or coincidental symptoms that are misattributed to the vaccine. Following vaccination, an expectation that the vaccine causes side-effects may also contribute to parents detecting symptoms in their child that might otherwise have gone unnoticed. Perception of side-effects may also influence the parent's decision to vaccinate their child again in following years.
Other possible factors influencing parents' perception of side-effects and their willingness to vaccinate their child again are their personal health beliefs and their interpretations of the information they are given about vaccination and side-effects. These cognitive processes can be measured objectively using experimental tasks, and can reveal characteristic patterns, or 'cognitive biases' which govern behaviour.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 270
- Parents of guardians of children aged 2-4 on 31st August 2016 (i.e. born September 1st 2011 to August 31st 2014) who receive the flu vaccine at the GP
- Parents must be aged 18 or over
- Parents must be fluent in English
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Participants No intervention Parents of children aged 2-4 who will receive the child flu vaccine from their general practitioner (GP)
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of participants who perceive their child to have treatment-related adverse events from the child flu vaccine October 2016 - March 2017 Using questionnaire materials as a method of assessment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Intention to re-vaccinate child October 2016 - March 2017 Using a scale as a method of assessment
Negative interpretative bias scores as assessed by the scrambled sentences and similarity ratings tasks October 2016 - March 2017
Trial Locations
- Locations (11)
Albion Street Group Practice
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Claremont Medical Centre
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Honor Oak Group Practice
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
The Rosendale Surgery
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Herne Hill Group Practice
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Links Medical Practice
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Morden Hall Medical Centre
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Park Group Practice
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Woodlands Practice
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Hurley Clinic
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Paxton Green Group Practice
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom