National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Decision Support Tool for Patients With NSCLC
- Conditions
- Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- Interventions
- Behavioral: decision support tool
- Registration Number
- NCT03982459
- Lead Sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Brief Summary
This study involves the evaluation of a decision support tool, based on the patient version of the NCCN guidelines, for the non-small cell lung cancer patient population.
- Detailed Description
This study involves the evaluation of a decision support tool, based on the patient version of the NCCN guidelines, for the non-small cell lung cancer patient population. The decision support tool is offered by a trained coordinator to the patient and then utilized during an initial consultation. Patients complete forms before and after the visit indicating their level of decisional conflict, satisfaction, and satisfaction with decision. Pre-determined indices of quality of care were also collected by the study team.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 76
- Over age of 18
- Able to provide informed consent
- Able to use a web-based interface
- Histologically proven or clinically apparent diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
- Newly diagnosed, with new primary occurrence of NSCLC, or diagnosed with a new recurrence or new progression of existing disease, and not yet treated for the new problem
- Being seen in consultation at thoracic oncology clinics
- Unable to fill out questionnaires
- Already treated for the current diagnosis of a new primary occurrence of NSCLC, or already treated for the new recurrence or new progression of existing disease
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Decision support tool decision support tool Patients in this single-arm study all receive training in use of a decision support tool by a trained coordinator.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Reporting Quality of Care on Selected National Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCCN) Recommendations 1 Day Participants explored individually tailored decision trees derived from the NCCN guidelines. Six benchmarks of quality care derived from the guidelines were evaluated: (1) documented smoking cessation counseling in active smokers, (2) adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage IB to IIB NSCLC after surgery, (3) pathologic mediastinal staging in patients with stage III NSCLC before surgery, (4) pathologic mediastinal staging in patients with stage III NSCLC before nonsurgical management, (5) definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III NSCLC not undergoing surgery, and (6) molecular testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) alterations for patients with stage IV NSCLC. Because the decision trees were tailored, not all participants evaluated all 6 benchmarks. The percentage of participants who interacted with each benchmark and demonstrated quality of care will be reported.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Median Change in Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Score Over Time 1 Day Change in level of decisional conflict will be assessed by the DCS completed before and after consultation. The DCS is a scale designed to measure participants' uncertainty in making health-related decisions, factors contributing to uncertainty, and participants perceived effective decision-support. The DCS has a total of 16 items and uses a five-point Likert scale for each item. The total score ranging from 0-64 is divided by 16 and then multiplied by 25 to calculate a final total score with 0 indicating low conflict and 100 indicating high conflict. The median change in score over time and the interquartile range will be reported.
Median Scores by Item on the Satisfaction With Health Care Decision Questionnaire 1 Day The Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Decision (SWD) Questionnaire is a six-item survey with item responses ranging from 1 -5 with a higher value indicating a higher degree of satisfaction or agreement with the statement.
The median score of each item and the interquartile range will be reported.Number of Participants by Response on the Decisional Support Preference Questionnaire (DMPQ) 1 Day Participants preferred style of decision making with their physician will be assessed using the Decision Making Preference Questionnaire (DMPQ). The DMPQ consists of a single question with five choices, ranging from a preference to have the doctor make all of the decisions (passive) to the patient making all of the decisions themselves about their treatment (active) or a combination of shared decision making ranging from the most passive in self-decision making preference to the most active in self-decision making. The number of participants by response will be reported.
Median Total Score on the Quality of Life by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Questionnaire 1 Day The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) Scale is a 36-item self-report instrument that measures multidimensional quality of life for patients with lung cancer. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "Not at all" to 4 = "Very much" with a total score range of 0-144, and higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Median Scores on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Lung Symptom Index (NFLSI-17) 1 Day The NCCN/FACT Lung Cancer Symptom Index-17 (NFLSI-17) is a brief symptom index for patients with advanced lung cancer. The NFLSI-17 is a 17-item patient-reported questionnaire. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "Not at all" to 4 = "Very much" with a total score range of 0-68. The questionnaire includes three subscales: Disease-Related Subscale, Treatment Side Effects, and Functional Well-Being with higher scores indicating lower overall symptoms.
Percentage of Participants With Reported Agreement at Post Consultation With Physician 1 Day The percentage of participants who completed the post-consultation questionnaire and reported achieving agreement on treatment recommendations between the participants and the physician with respect to treatments discussed and recommended, prognosis, and expected tolerance will be reported.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of California, San Francisco
🇺🇸San Francisco, California, United States