Accuracy of digital- and conventional dental impressions - A clinical trial
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Prosthesis
- Registration Number
- DRKS00005958
- Lead Sponsor
- Zahn-, Mund- und Kieferheilkunde, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Patients with the medical indication for a fixed prosthesis. The finish line of the tooth has to be visible and it should be possible to keep it dry. Patient has to agree with the study and sign it.
Exclusion Criteria
The finish line is not visible and it is not possible to keep it dry. The Patient does not agree with the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluation of the achievable marginal accuracy of zirconiumoxide fixed prosthethis, which are produced by different impressions techniques (conventional two stage impression, three intraoral digital impressions, indirect laboratory scan). Measurement of the marginal accuracy with the replica technique and with Marxkors probes.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Influence of the measuring point (vestibular, oral, mesial, distal) on the marginal accuracy. Influence of the jaw on the marginal accuracy.