Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) versus Fentanyl for alleviating pain in patients with acute severe backache in the Emergency Department: a comparative parallel-group two-arm open label pilot randomized control trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- To assess the efficacy of successful pain relief after six hours of intervention in both ESPB arm and Fentanyl arm
研究概览
简要总结
This study is designed as a comparative parallel group, two arm, open label, pilot randomized control trial to evaluate the efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Fentanyl in managing acute severe backache in patients presenting to the Emergency Department. Eligible participants include individuals aged 18 years or older who present with acute severe lumbar back pain, whether due to mechanical causes, malignancy related pain or trauma after excluding vertebral fractures. Each patient will undergo a thorough history taking and clinical examination. Those who are hemodynamically stable, have no known allergies to the study drugs and score of 7 or more on Defence and Veteran Pain Rating Scale will be enrolled, provided they meet all the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria apply. Randomization will be conducted using preformed, computer generated sequences employing a mixed block randomization method. To maintain allocation concealment, the generated sequences will be sealed in opaque envelopes. The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of pain relief achieved six hours post intervention in both the ESPB and Fentanyl arms. The secondary objectives include assessing the safety profile, patient satisfaction and the quantity of rescue analgesic medications required within six hours post intervention, comparing outcomes between the intervention and control groups.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Age 18 years or older
- •Acute severe lumbar back pain
- •DVPRS score of 7 or more.
排除标准
- •Symptoms of cauda equina syndrome
- •Progressive neurologic symptoms
- •Abdominal Aorta Aneurysm
- •Vertebral fracture
- •Evidence of skin/soft tissue infection at the block site
- •Spine deformity (both acquired or congenital)
- •Known Bleeding Disorder
- •Unwillingness to participate
- •Pregnancy
- •Patients of Chronic liver disease, Chronic kidney Disease, Congestive heart failure
- •Immunocompromised patients 13.
结局指标
主要结局
To assess the efficacy of successful pain relief after six hours of intervention in both ESPB arm and Fentanyl arm
时间窗: 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 6 hours
次要结局
- To assess the amount of rescue analgesic medications required at 6 hours of intervention(6 hours)
- To study safety of ESPB in comparison to Fentanyl at 6 hours(6 hours)
- To evaluate patient satisfaction among patient groups receiving ESPB versus Fentanyl in terms of reduction of pain in Likert scale (from 0: ‘‘Very unsatisfied¨ to 5: ‘‘very satisfied¨)(6 hours)
研究者
Dr Abhisek Nayak
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
