MedPath

Hepatoprotective Effect of Remote vs Local Preconditioning of Liver

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Liver Metastases
Interventions
Procedure: Preconditioning
Registration Number
NCT03130920
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital Dubrava
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate hepatoprotective effect from ischemia-reperfusion injury of remote ischemic preconditioning of the liver against local ischemic preconditioning of the liver during human liver resections.

Detailed Description

In this randomized control study, a total of 60 patients were randomized into 3 groups: remote ischemic precondition group - RIPC (3 intervals of 5 minute right upper limb ischemia with 3 intervals of 5 minute reperfusion), local ischemic precondition group - LIPC (15 minutes of inflow liver occlusion followed by 10 minutes of reperfusion before liver transection), control group - CG (group without ischemic preconditioning before liver transection). Patients were also stratified according to the extent of the hepatectomy. Hepatoprotective effect was evaluated by comparing serum transaminase levels, bilirubin levels, albumin, and protein levels, coagulograms and pathohistological exams. We also measured flow rate by Doppler ultrasound of hepatic artery and portal vein before and after preconditioning.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis all of which signed an informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • having any other underlying liver disease, or preoperative increased liver transaminase, bilirubin
  • patients with chronic cardiac, pulmonary or renal disease

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Remote ischemic preconditioningPreconditioning-
Local ischemic preconditioningPreconditioning-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in synthetic liver functionPreoperatively, first, third and seventh postoperative day

We measured residual synthetic liver function and liver ischemic-reperfusion injury by value level of bilirubin, total proteins, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glutamic aminotransferase (ƴGT), cholinesterase, alkaline phosphatase (AP), coagulogram.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Flow through the hepatic artery and portal veinBefore and after preconditioning

During operation we preformed Doppler ultrasonography of hepatic artery and portal vein.

Liver histology evaluationUp to 10 days after operation

Liver paraffin-embedded, standard haematoxylin-eosin stained sections were analysed postoperatively to evaluate the ischemic reperfusion injury . According to Rodriguez et al. four elements of the liver histology were analysed: steatosis (micro vesicular and macro vesicular) in 4 grades, degree of sinusoidal congestion and dilatation in 3 grades, leukocyte infiltration in 3 grades and necrosis (focal, confluent, or zonal) in 3 grades.26 Each biopsy was evaluated by a single pathologist blinded to the treatment allocation.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital Dubrava

🇭🇷

Zagreb, Croatia

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath