跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2025/06/088910
CTRI/2025/06/088910尚未招募不适用

Effectiveness of Foam Rolling and Muscle Energy Technique on Pain, Range of Motion, Functional Disability and Quality of Life in Patients with Mechanical Neck Pain : A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Datta Meghe College Of Physiotherpy Nagpur1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 62 人开始时间: 2025年11月7日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
发起方
入组人数
62
试验地点
1
主要终点
Numerical pain rating scale

研究概览

简要总结

Neck pain is a prevalent cause of long-term impairment globally, accounting for around 30% of cases each year. Women are more affected than men, and middle-aged people are more likely to experience . Mechanical neck pain (MNP) can cause pain, limited range of motion, and reduced function. It is frequently caused by muscular spasms or problems with the facet joints

Alternative therapies including Myofascial Release (MFR) and Muscle Energy Techniques (MET) have been studied recently. MET, a manual therapy, has been shown to be successful in increasing range of motion and reducing pain by contracting muscles against resistance to increase mobility and decrease muscle tension. MFR has also demonstrated advantages in reducing pain and enhancing function in MNP patients by applying concentrated force to target fascial limitations.

Another promising technique is foam rolling, which is a type of self-myofascial release. By using a foam roller to apply pressure to muscular tissues, it helps to increase flexibility and lessen muscle tightness. Although foam rolling has demonstrated advantages in enhancing short-term range of motion, nothing is known about how well it works to relieve mechanical neck discomfort.

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of foam rolling and MET on MNP patients’ pain, range of motion, functional disability, and quality of life using a variety of end measures, such as disability indices and pain scales. Over the course of four weeks, both groups will also receive traditional exercise regimens.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
19.00 Year(s) 至 35.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients are willing to participate.
  • Experiencing mechanical neck pain for 3 months.
  • Neck pain on NPRS between 4 to
  • NDI more than 40 percentage.

排除标准

  • A history of cervical spine injuries or fractures.
  • Cervical radiculopathy symptoms.
  • A history of degenerative musculoskeletal disorders, such as osteoporosis, spondylosis, spondylolisthesis, and prolapsed intervertebral disc.
  • Patients with acute neck pain.
  • Patients with history of surgery of the cervical spine during the previous 12 months Subjects were excluded if they have neck pain associated with headaches or facial pain and malignancy, infections, inflammatory disorders.
  • Subjects were excluded with neurological conditions.

结局指标

主要结局

Numerical pain rating scale

时间窗: Pre treatment day 1 and post treatment after 4 weeks

Neck disability index

时间窗: Pre treatment day 1 and post treatment after 4 weeks

Goniometer

时间窗: Pre treatment day 1 and post treatment after 4 weeks

SF36

时间窗: Pre treatment day 1 and post treatment after 4 weeks

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Datta Meghe College Of Physiotherpy Nagpur
申办方类型
Research institution and hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验