跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03674489
NCT03674489已完成不适用

Local and Widespread Hypoalgesic Effects of Neurodynamic Mobilization in Healthy Controls

Brenau University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2018年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)

研究概览

简要总结

Background & Significance Pain is the primary reason many patients seek care from healthcare professionals who utilize various manual therapy techniques. Gaining further understanding of the hypoalgesic properties of such techniques can enable practitioners to more skillfully integrate them in managing patients presenting with pain. Previous research has revealed that various manual techniques result in both local and widespread hypoalgesic changes in asymptomatic controls and patients in pain. Much of this previous research has investigated thrust manipulation; however, there is a paucity of similar research investigating these effects in neurodynamic mobilization.

Specific Aims Aim: To assess for immediate local and widespread hypoalgesic effects of neurodynamic mobilization applied to the upper extremity.

Hypotheses:

  • Subjects who receive neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in local and widespread Qualitative Sensory Testing (QST) measures compared to those who receive a sham mobilization.
  • Subjects who receive neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in elbow ROM and reported sensation intensity with upper limb neurodyndamic testing as compared to those who receive a sham mobilization.

Aim: To assess for differences in immediate local and widespread hypoalgesic effects of sliding vs tensioning neurodynamic mobilization techniques applied to the upper extremity

Hypotheses:

  • Subjects who receive sliding neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in local and widespread QST measures compared to those who receive tensioning neurodynamic mobilization
  • Subjects who receive sliding neurodynamic mobilizations will exhibit greater positive changes in elbow range of motion (ROM) and reported sensation intensity with upper limb neurodynamic testing testing compared to those who receive a tensioning neurodynamic mobilization

详细描述

See protocol uploaded in documents section

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age: 18-65
  • Ability to speak and comprehend English.

排除标准

  • Current neck or upper extremity symptoms
  • Disorders that could result in impaired sensation - such as diabetes.
  • Current use of prescription pain medication or other medications that could result in altered pain perception - such as anti-anxiety medications or anti-depressants.
  • History of any chronic painful condition
  • Diagnosis of any major psychiatric disorder
  • Current pregnancy
  • Any painful condition within the past 3 months for which care was sought

结局指标

主要结局

Pressure Pain Threshold (PPT)

时间窗: change from baseline immediately after intervention

PPT will be assessed bilaterally over the thenar eminences, over the dorsal aspect of the 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, and over the tibialis anterior using a pressure algometer with an affixed 1cm2 rubber tip.

Thermal Pain Threshold (TPT)

时间窗: change from baseline immediately after intervention

TPT will be assessed bilaterally over the thenar eminences, over the dorsal aspect of the 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, and over the tibialis anterior.

Thermal Pain Tolerance (TPTol)

时间窗: change from baseline immediately after intervention

TPTol will be assessed bilaterally over the thenar eminences, over the dorsal aspect of the 1st carpometacarpal (CMC) joint, and over the tibialis anterior.

Elbow Extension ROM Obtained on Neurodynamic Testing

时间窗: change from baseline immediately after intervention

A neurodynamic test of the median nerve will be performed according to the ULNT1 procedure originally described by David Butler. Degrees of elbow extension will then be recorded using a universal goniometer, and each subject will rate each of the following 5 sensory descriptors on a 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS): "Stinging", "Tingling", "Tightness", "Sharpness", and "Numbness". The average of the 5 sensory descriptor ratings will then be averaged to create a single sensory descriptor VAS score - as outlined in Beneciuk et al 2009.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Daniel Maddox, PT, DPT

Assistant Professor

Brenau University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验